2017 Isuzu D-Max MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2017 Isuzu D-Max MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Isuzu D-Max MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9 |
25
/
34 MPG
(9.3 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.9 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
34 MPG
(9.3 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Isuzu D-Max MPG is between 22 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Isuzu D-Max MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Isuzu D-Max MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TD Single Cab |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
- | 0% |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.5 TD Double Cab |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.0 TD Double Cab |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.5 TD Space Cab |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.0 TD Space Cab |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
- | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.0 TD Single Cab |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
4.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD Single Cab |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD Double Cab |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TD Double Cab |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD Space Cab |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TD Space Cab |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TD Single Cab |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.2 L per 100 km / person |
