2015 Infiniti QX50 MPG is between 16 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Infiniti QX50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Infiniti QX50 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 V6 |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.7 V6 |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2014 Infiniti QX50 MPG is between 15 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 Infiniti QX50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Infiniti QX50 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 V6 |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.7 V6 |
15
/
27 MPG
(16 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.0d V6 |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
27 MPG
(16 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0d V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
