1989 Hyundai Pony MPG is between 21 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Hyundai Pony MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Hyundai Pony MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 i |
21
/
44 MPG
(11 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 |
21
/
42 MPG
(11 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
44 MPG
(11 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
42 MPG
(11 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Hyundai Pony MPG is between 21 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Hyundai Pony MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Hyundai Pony MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
21
/
44 MPG
(11 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i |
21
/
44 MPG
(11 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
44 MPG
(11 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
44 MPG
(11 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |