2016 Honda Shuttle MPG is 81 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Honda Shuttle MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Honda Shuttle MPG is up to 103% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
57
/
81 MPG
(4.1 / 2.9 L per 100 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 103% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
57
/
81 MPG
(4.1 / 2.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 103% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Honda Shuttle MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Honda Shuttle MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Honda Shuttle MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 16V |
21
/
26 MPG
(11.2 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
-
|
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
26 MPG
(11.2 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |