Honda Pilot MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Honda Pilot MPG by Years


Quick Notes on Honda Pilot MPG

    • average 2020 Honda Pilot MPG: 23 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
    • worst 2020 Honda Pilot MPG: 20 MPG / 11.7 L per 100 km
    • best 2020 Honda Pilot MPG: 27 MPG / 8.7 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1863-1871 kg / 4108 lbs
    • body type: SUV
    • difference highway / city: 26%
    • average engine power: 206 kW / 280 hp
    • difference from world average: 28% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 450 miles (725 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2020 Honda Pilot MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2020 Honda Pilot MPG is 27 MPG on engine:

  • 3.5 V6 — 20 to 27 MPG

    2020 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio

    The 2020 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.5 V6 — 81 kg/mpg

    2020 Honda Pilot MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2020 Honda Pilot MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.5 V6 is 28% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2020 Honda Pilot III (facelift 2019) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.5 V6 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2020 Honda Pilot III (facelift 2019) MPG

    Vehicle 3.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Honda Pilot MPG

      • average 2016 Honda Pilot MPG: 23 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 2016 Honda Pilot MPG: 20 MPG / 11.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2016 Honda Pilot MPG: 27 MPG / 8.7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1878 kg / 4141 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 26%
      • average engine power: 206 kW / 280 hp
      • difference from world average: 28% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 450 miles (725 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2016 Honda Pilot MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2016 Honda Pilot MPG is 27 MPG on engine:

  • 3.5 V6 — 20 to 27 MPG

    2016 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio

    The 2016 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.5 V6 — 82 kg/mpg

    2016 Honda Pilot MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2016 Honda Pilot MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.5 V6 is 28% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2016 Honda Pilot III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.5 V6 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2016 Honda Pilot III MPG

    Vehicle 3.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Honda Pilot MPG

      • average 2009 Honda Pilot MPG: 20 MPG / 12.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 2009 Honda Pilot MPG: 16 MPG / 14.7 L per 100 km
      • best 2009 Honda Pilot MPG: 22 MPG / 10.7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2041-2087 kg / 4500 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 27%
      • average engine power: 186 kW / 253 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 375 miles (603 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2009 Honda Pilot MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2009 Honda Pilot MPG is 22 MPG on engine:

  • 3.5 V6 — 16 to 22 MPG

    2009 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio

    The 2009 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.5 V6 — 113 kg/mpg

    2009 Honda Pilot MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2009 Honda Pilot MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.5 V6 is 44% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2009 Honda Pilot II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.5 V6 16 / 22 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2009 Honda Pilot II MPG

    Vehicle 3.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 22 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Honda Pilot MPG

      • average 2003 Honda Pilot MPG: 20 MPG / 12.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2003 Honda Pilot MPG: 17 MPG / 13.9 L per 100 km
      • best 2003 Honda Pilot MPG: 22 MPG / 10.7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1999 kg / 4408 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 23%
      • average engine power: 190 kW / 258 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 389 miles (626 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2003 Honda Pilot MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2003 Honda Pilot MPG is 22 MPG on engine:

  • 3.5 V6 — 17 to 22 MPG

    2003 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio

    The 2003 Honda Pilot MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.5 V6 — 105 kg/mpg

    2003 Honda Pilot MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2003 Honda Pilot MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.5 V6 is 41% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2003 Honda Pilot I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.5 V6 17 / 22 MPG
    (13.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 373—435 miles
    (600—700 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2003 Honda Pilot I MPG

    Vehicle 3.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 22 MPG
    (13.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—435 miles (600—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person