2019 Honda CR-V MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5i |
27
/
32 MPG
(8.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
32 MPG
(8.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Honda CR-V MPG is between 24 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
25
/
31 MPG
(9.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 |
27
/
33 MPG
(8.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i-VTEC |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i-DTEC |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 VTEC TURBO |
27
/
38 MPG
(8.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
56
/
52 MPG
(4.2 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
870—808 miles
(1400—1300 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 VTEC |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
31 MPG
(9.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
33 MPG
(8.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 VTEC TURBO |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
38 MPG
(8.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
56
/
52 MPG
(4.2 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 870—808 miles (1400—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Honda CR-V MPG is between 25 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i-DTEC |
42
/
49 MPG
(5.6 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i-VTEC |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i-DTEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
49 MPG
(5.6 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Honda CR-V MPG is between 26 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-DTEC |
35
/
44 MPG
(6.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—684 miles
(900—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i-DTEC |
49
/
55 MPG
(4.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
746—808 miles
(1200—1300 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
44 MPG
(6.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—684 miles (900—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
55 MPG
(4.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—808 miles (1200—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Honda CR-V MPG is between 22 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-DTEC |
29
/
42 MPG
(8 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
42 MPG
(8 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Honda CR-V MPG is between 18 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-CDTi |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.1 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i-VTEC |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CDTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.1 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Honda CR-V MPG is between 19 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 16V LX |
21
/
25 MPG
(11.2 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V LX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
25 MPG
(11.2 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Honda CR-V MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Honda CR-V MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Honda CR-V MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |