2018 Accord X
2016 Accord IX (facelift 2016)
2016 Accord IX Coupe (facelift 2016)
2012 Accord IX Coupe
2012 Accord IX
2011 Accord VIII (facelift 2011) Wagon
2011 Accord VIII (facelift 2011)
2008 Accord VIII
2008 Accord VIII Wagon
2008 Accord VIII Coupe
2002 Accord VII Coupe
2002 Accord VII
2002 Accord VII Wagon
1998 Accord VI Coupe
1998 Accord VI Wagon
1998 Accord VI Hatchback
1998 Accord VI (CE,CF)
1996 Accord V (CC7, facelift 1996)
1993 Accord V (CC7)
1993 Accord V Coupe (CD7)
1993 Accord V Wagon (CE)
1990 Accord IV Coupe (CC1)
1990 Accord IV (CB3,CB7)
1990 Accord IV Wagon (CB8)
2018 Honda Accord MPG is 35 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Honda Accord MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 1.5 Turbo |
26
/
35 MPG
(9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 1.5 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
35 MPG
(9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Honda Accord MPG is between 21 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Honda Accord MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
49
/
47 MPG
(4.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
808—746 miles
(1300—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
47 MPG
(4.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—746 miles (1300—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Honda Accord MPG is between 21 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Honda Accord MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Honda Accord MPG is between 21 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Honda Accord MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
27
/
35 MPG
(8.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
35 MPG
(8.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Honda Accord MPG is between 21 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Honda Accord MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
47
/
46 MPG
(5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
559—559 miles
(900—900 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
46 MPG
(5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—559 miles (900—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Honda Accord MPG is between 19 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Honda Accord MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i-VTEC |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-DTEC |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Honda Accord MPG is between 20 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Honda Accord MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
23
/
42 MPG
(10.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—746 miles
(600—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-DTEC |
29
/
47 MPG
(8.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i-VTEC |
20
/
37 MPG
(12 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
42 MPG
(10.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—746 miles (600—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
47 MPG
(8.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(12 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Honda Accord MPG is between 20 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Honda Accord MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.4i MT |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4i Automatic |
20
/
36 MPG
(12 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-DTEC |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-DTEC Type S |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i MT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i Automatic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(12 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC Type S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Honda Accord MPG is between 19 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Honda Accord MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-Dtec |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-Dtec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Honda Accord MPG is between 19 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Honda Accord MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.5i V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Honda Accord MPG is between 21 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Honda Accord MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
26
/
34 MPG
(9.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 24V |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
34 MPG
(9.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Honda Accord MPG is between 17 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Honda Accord MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
20
/
38 MPG
(11.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i-VTEC 16V Sport |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-CTDi |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
38 MPG
(11.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V Sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CTDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Honda Accord MPG is between 16 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Honda Accord MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i-CTDi |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.3 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CTDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.3 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Honda Accord MPG is between 16 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Honda Accord MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
16
/
29 MPG
(15 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(15 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Honda Accord MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 1998 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Honda Accord MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 16V |
18
/
34 MPG
(13 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
34 MPG
(13 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Honda Accord MPG is between 19 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Honda Accord MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.3i 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Honda Accord MPG is between 18 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Honda Accord MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo Di |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 Type-R |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo Di |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 Type-R |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Honda Accord MPG is between 24 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Honda Accord MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDi |
28
/
52 MPG
(8.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i VTEC |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
52 MPG
(8.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i VTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Honda Accord MPG is between 23 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Honda Accord MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i S |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i SR |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i SR |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Honda Accord MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 1993 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Honda Accord MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i ES |
20
/
32 MPG
(12 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i ES |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
32 MPG
(12 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Honda Accord MPG is between 22 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Honda Accord MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i ES |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i LS 16V |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i ES |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i LS 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Honda Accord MPG is between 17 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Honda Accord MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Honda Accord MPG is between 17 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Honda Accord MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.3 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i 16V |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.3 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Honda Accord MPG is 35 MPG on engine:
The 1990 Honda Accord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Honda Accord MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |