2018 Holden Commodore MPG is between 23 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.6i V6 |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0d |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Holden Commodore MPG is between 22 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6i V6 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0d |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Holden Commodore MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6i V6 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Holden Commodore MPG is between 18 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7i V8 |
18
/
32 MPG
(13 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 Acclaim |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.8i V6 Executive |
21
/
35 MPG
(11 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 i V8 SS |
18
/
32 MPG
(13 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 S |
18
/
31 MPG
(13 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7i V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(13 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 Acclaim |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 Executive |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
35 MPG
(11 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 SS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(13 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(13 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Holden Commodore MPG is between 17 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 i V6 Acclaim |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 Executive |
21
/
34 MPG
(11 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 i V8 Executive |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 S.G |
18
/
31 MPG
(13 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 Acclaim |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 Executive |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 Executive |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 S.G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(13 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Holden Commodore MPG is between 16 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8i V6 Acclaim |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 i V8 SS |
16
/
22 MPG
(15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
5.0i V8 SS |
16
/
22 MPG
(15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 Acclaim |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 i V8 SS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0i V8 SS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Holden Commodore MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 1991 Holden Commodore MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Holden Commodore MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8i V6 Acclaim |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 Acclaim |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |