2016 GMC Terrain MPG is between 17 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 GMC Terrain MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 GMC Terrain MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.6 V6 |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2010 GMC Terrain MPG is between 16 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 GMC Terrain MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 GMC Terrain MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 V6 |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.4 |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.4 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
