2016 Geely Emgrand X7 MPG is between 17 MPG and 38 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Geely Emgrand X7 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Geely Emgrand X7 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
21
/
38 MPG
(11.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
38 MPG
(11.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Geely Emgrand X7 MPG is between 22 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Geely Emgrand X7 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Geely Emgrand X7 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |