cat_logo
HomeGaz

31

GAZ 31 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average GAZ 31 MPG by Years

GAZ 31 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on GAZ 31 MPG

    • average 310221 GAZ 31 MPG: 23 MPG / 10.5 L per 100 km
    • worst 310221 GAZ 31 MPG: 16 MPG / 14.5 L per 100 km
    • best 310221 GAZ 31 MPG: 34 MPG / 7 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1540 kg / 3396 lbs
    • body type: station wagon (estate)
    • difference highway / city: 29%
    • average engine power: 80 kW / 109 hp
    • difference from world average: 28% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 494 miles (795 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

310221 GAZ 31 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

310221 GAZ 31 MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 TD — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 2.3 i 16V — 16 to 24 MPG
  • 2.3 16V — 20 to 25 MPG
  • 2.5 — 20 to 28 MPG
  • 2.4 — 19 to 27 MPG


    310221 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio

    The 310221 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.1 TD — 57 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i 16V — 81 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 16V — 66 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 — 67 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 — 70 kg/mpg


    310221 GAZ 31 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 310221 GAZ 31 MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 TD is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 i 16V is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 16V is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 310221 GAZ MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 TD 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.3 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i 16V 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.5 / 9.8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 16V 20 / 25 MPG
    (11.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 310221 GAZ MPG

    Vehicle 2.1 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.3 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.5 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 25 MPG
    (11.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on GAZ 31 MPG

      • average 2003 GAZ 31 MPG: 24 MPG / 9.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 2003 GAZ 31 MPG: 21 MPG / 11 L per 100 km
      • best 2003 GAZ 31 MPG: 32 MPG / 7.4 L per 100 km
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 34%
      • average engine power: 96 kW / 131 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2003 GAZ 31 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2003 GAZ 31 MPG is 32 MPG on engine:

  • 2.3 i 16V — 21 to 32 MPG


    2003 GAZ 31 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2003 GAZ 31 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 i 16V is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2003 GAZ 31105 MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 i 16V 21 / 32 MPG
    (11 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		- 22% worse -
    		1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2003 GAZ 31105 MPG

    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 32 MPG
    (11 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) -
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on GAZ 31 MPG

      • average 1998 GAZ 31 MPG: 24 MPG / 9.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 1998 GAZ 31 MPG: 21 MPG / 11.2 L per 100 km
      • best 1998 GAZ 31 MPG: 31 MPG / 7.6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1690 kg / 3726 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 96 kW / 131 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 458 miles (737 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1998 GAZ 31 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1998 GAZ 31 MPG is 31 MPG on engine:

  • 2.3 i 16V — 21 to 31 MPG


    1998 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1998 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3 i 16V — 68 kg/mpg


    1998 GAZ 31 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1998 GAZ 31 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 i 16V is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1998 GAZ 3111 MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 i 16V 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1998 GAZ 3111 MPG

    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on GAZ 31 MPG

      • average 1997 GAZ 31 MPG: 23 MPG / 10.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1997 GAZ 31 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1997 GAZ 31 MPG: 34 MPG / 7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1400 kg / 3087 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 35%
      • average engine power: 88 kW / 119 hp
      • difference from world average: 28% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 494 miles (795 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1997 GAZ 31 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1997 GAZ 31 MPG is between 17 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.3 — 17 to 26 MPG
  • 2.3 i 16V — 17 to 26 MPG
  • 2.1 TD — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 2.5 — 18 to 27 MPG


    1997 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1997 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3 — 70 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i 16V — 70 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 TD — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 — 67 kg/mpg


    1997 GAZ 31 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1997 GAZ 31 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 i 16V is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 TD is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1997 GAZ 3110 MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.2 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i 16V 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.2 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 TD 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.3 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 18 / 27 MPG
    (13 / 8.8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1997 GAZ 3110 MPG

    Vehicle 2.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.3 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 27 MPG
    (13 / 8.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on GAZ 31 MPG

      • average 1991 GAZ 31 MPG: 22 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 1991 GAZ 31 MPG: 16 MPG / 15 L per 100 km
      • best 1991 GAZ 31 MPG: 25 MPG / 9.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1400 kg / 3087 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 74 kW / 100 hp
      • difference from world average: 31% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 265 miles (426 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1991 GAZ 31 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1991 GAZ 31 MPG is 25 MPG on engine:

  • 2.4 — 16 to 25 MPG


    1991 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1991 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.4 — 78 kg/mpg


    1991 GAZ 31 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1991 GAZ 31 MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.4 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1991 GAZ 31029 MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.4 16 / 25 MPG
    (15 / 9.3 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1991 GAZ 31029 MPG

    Vehicle 2.4
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 25 MPG
    (15 / 9.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on GAZ 31 MPG

      • average 1982 GAZ 31 MPG: 22 MPG / 11.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1982 GAZ 31 MPG: 15 MPG / 15.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1982 GAZ 31 MPG: 32 MPG / 7.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1540 kg / 3396 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 74 kW / 101 hp
      • difference from world average: 31% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 468 miles (753 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1982 GAZ 31 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1982 GAZ 31 MPG is between 15 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.3 i 16V — 17 to 26 MPG
  • 2.5 — 16 to 32 MPG
  • 2.4 — 15 to 22 MPG


    1982 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1982 GAZ 31 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3 i 16V — 73 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 — 86 kg/mpg


    1982 GAZ 31 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1982 GAZ 31 MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 i 16V is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1982 GAZ 3102 MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 i 16V 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.2 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 16 / 32 MPG
    (15 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 15 / 22 MPG
    (15.5 / 10.6 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1982 GAZ 3102 MPG

    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 32 MPG
    (15 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 22 MPG
    (15.5 / 10.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings