2002 Ford Thunderbird MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2002 Ford Thunderbird MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Ford Thunderbird MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 i V8 32V |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
6.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 4.0 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 6.1 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Ford Thunderbird MPG is between 12 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Ford Thunderbird MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Ford Thunderbird MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.8 i V6 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| 4.6i V8 |
12
/
21 MPG
(19 / 11 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 4.6i V8 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
21 MPG
(19 / 11 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
