cat_logo
HomeFord

Taurus

Ford Taurus MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford Taurus MPG by Years

Ford Taurus MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

    • average 2015 Ford Taurus MPG: 31 MPG / 7.9 L per 100 km
    • worst 2015 Ford Taurus MPG: 22 MPG / 10.6 L per 100 km
    • best 2015 Ford Taurus MPG: 41 MPG / 5.7 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1875 kg / 4134 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 30%
    • average engine power: 185 kW / 252 hp
    • difference from world average: 3% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 560 miles (901 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

2015 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is between 22 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • EcoBoost 180 — 29 to 41 MPG
  • EcoBoost 245 — 26 to 37 MPG
  • EcoBoost 325 V6 — 22 to 32 MPG


    2015 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • EcoBoost 180 — 52 kg/mpg
  • EcoBoost 245 — 58 kg/mpg
  • EcoBoost 325 V6 — 72 kg/mpg


    2015 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.

  • EcoBoost 180 is 3% more economical than average car
  • EcoBoost 245 is 6% less economical than average car
  • EcoBoost 325 V6 is 19% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford (China) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    EcoBoost 180 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    EcoBoost 245 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    EcoBoost 325 V6 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford (China) MPG

    Vehicle EcoBoost 180
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle EcoBoost 245
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle EcoBoost 325 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 2013 Ford Taurus MPG: 25 MPG / 10.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2013 Ford Taurus MPG: 17 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2013 Ford Taurus MPG: 32 MPG / 7.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1798 kg / 3965 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 219 kW / 298 hp
      • difference from world average: 22% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 476 miles (766 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2013 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is between 17 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:

  • SHO 3.5 V6 — 17 to 25 MPG
  • 3.5 V6 24V — 19 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 22 to 32 MPG


    2013 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • SHO 3.5 V6 — 99 kg/mpg
  • 3.5 V6 24V — 78 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 72 kg/mpg


    2013 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • SHO 3.5 V6 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.5 V6 24V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBoost is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford VI (facelift 2013) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    SHO 3.5 V6 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.5 V6 24V 19 / 29 MPG
    (12.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBoost 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford VI (facelift 2013) MPG

    Vehicle SHO 3.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.5 V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 29 MPG
    (12.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 2009 Ford Taurus MPG: 23 MPG / 11.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 2009 Ford Taurus MPG: 17 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2009 Ford Taurus MPG: 25 MPG / 9.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1981 kg / 4368 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 231 kW / 314 hp
      • difference from world average: 28% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 386 miles (621 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2009 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is between 17 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.5 V6 24V — 17 to 25 MPG
  • SHO 3.5 V6 — 17 to 25 MPG


    2009 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.5 V6 24V — 96 kg/mpg
  • SHO 3.5 V6 — 99 kg/mpg


    2009 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.5 V6 24V is 37% less economical than average car
  • SHO 3.5 V6 is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford VI MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.5 V6 24V 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    SHO 3.5 V6 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford VI MPG

    Vehicle 3.5 V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle SHO 3.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 2000 Ford Taurus MPG: 24 MPG / 10.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 2000 Ford Taurus MPG: 19 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
      • best 2000 Ford Taurus MPG: 26 MPG / 9.1 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1595 kg / 3517 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 27%
      • average engine power: 114 kW / 155 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 391 miles (630 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2000 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is 26 MPG on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 19 to 26 MPG


    2000 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 73 kg/mpg


    2000 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford IV Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford IV Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 1997 Ford Taurus MPG: 23 MPG / 10.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1997 Ford Taurus MPG: 17 MPG / 13.9 L per 100 km
      • best 1997 Ford Taurus MPG: 29 MPG / 8.1 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1560 kg / 3440 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 143 kW / 194 hp
      • difference from world average: 28% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 379 miles (610 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1997 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 17 to 28 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 24V — 20 to 29 MPG
  • SHO 3.4 V8 32V — 17 to 26 MPG


    1997 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 72 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 24V — 63 kg/mpg
  • SHO 3.4 V8 32V — 78 kg/mpg


    1997 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 24V is 25% less economical than average car
  • SHO 3.4 V8 32V is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 17 / 28 MPG
    (13.9 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 24V 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    SHO 3.4 V8 32V 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.1 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford III MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 28 MPG
    (13.9 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle SHO 3.4 V8 32V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 1995 Ford Taurus MPG: 24 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • worst 1995 Ford Taurus MPG: 20 MPG / 11.8 L per 100 km
      • best 1995 Ford Taurus MPG: 29 MPG / 8.1 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1579 kg / 3482 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 108 kW / 147 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 379 miles (610 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1995 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is 29 MPG on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 20 to 29 MPG


    1995 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 66 kg/mpg


    1995 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 25% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford III Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford III Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 1986 Ford Taurus MPG: 24 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 1986 Ford Taurus MPG: 19 MPG / 12.3 L per 100 km
      • best 1986 Ford Taurus MPG: 29 MPG / 8.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1462 kg / 3224 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 91 kW / 124 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 368 miles (592 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1986 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is between 19 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 3.8 V6 — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 20 to 29 MPG


    1986 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5 — 60 kg/mpg
  • 3.8 V6 — 67 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 64 kg/mpg


    1986 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 3.8 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 28% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford I Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    3.8 V6 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford I Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle 2.5
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.8 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Taurus MPG

      • average 1986 Ford Taurus MPG: 22 MPG / 12.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 1986 Ford Taurus MPG: 14 MPG / 17 L per 100 km
      • best 1986 Ford Taurus MPG: 24 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1372 kg / 3025 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 30%
      • average engine power: 91 kW / 124 hp
      • difference from world average: 31% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 316 miles (508 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1986 Ford Taurus MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is between 14 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5i — 17 to 24 MPG
  • 3.8 V6 — 14 to 21 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 16 to 24 MPG


    1986 Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio

    The Taurus Ford Taurus MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5i — 65 kg/mpg
  • 3.8 V6 — 82 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 72 kg/mpg


    1986 Ford Taurus MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that Taurus Ford Taurus MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5i is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.8 V6 is 47% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 41% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On Taurus Ford I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5i 17 / 24 MPG
    (14 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.8 V6 14 / 21 MPG
    (17 / 11 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 16 / 24 MPG
    (15 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On Taurus Ford I MPG

    Vehicle 2.5i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 24 MPG
    (14 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.8 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 21 MPG
    (17 / 11 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 24 MPG
    (15 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings