cat_logo
HomeFord

S-max

Ford S-MAX MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford S-MAX MPG by Years

Ford S-MAX MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Ford S-MAX MPG

    • average 2016 Ford S-MAX MPG: 39 MPG / 6.5 L per 100 km
    • worst 2016 Ford S-MAX MPG: 19 MPG / 12.5 L per 100 km
    • best 2016 Ford S-MAX MPG: 51 MPG / 4.6 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1766 kg / 3894 lbs
    • body type: MPV
    • difference highway / city: 27%
    • average engine power: 130 kW / 176 hp
    • difference from world average: 22% better
    • max distance with full tank: 870 miles (1400 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

2016 Ford S-MAX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2016 Ford S-MAX MPG is between 19 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.5 EcoBoost — 29 to 42 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 19 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 TDCi — 42 to 51 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBlue — 39 to 51 MPG
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue — 33 to 45 MPG


    2016 Ford S-MAX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2016 Ford S-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.5 EcoBoost — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 66 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TDCi — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBlue — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue — 44 kg/mpg


    2016 Ford S-MAX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2016 Ford S-MAX MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.5 EcoBoost is 13% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBoost is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TDCi is 47% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBlue is 44% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is 25% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2016 Ford S-MAX II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.5 EcoBoost 29 / 42 MPG
    (8 / 5.6 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBoost 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TDCi 42 / 51 MPG
    (5.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km)     		3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% better 808—932 miles
    (1300—1500 km)     		0.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBlue 39 / 51 MPG
    (6.1 / 4.6 L per 100 km)     		3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)     		0.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue 33 / 45 MPG
    (7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% better 621—808 miles
    (1000—1300 km)     		0.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2016 Ford S-MAX II MPG

    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 42 MPG
    (8 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 42 / 51 MPG
    (5.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% better
    Driving range (full tank) 808—932 miles (1300—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue
    Consumption (city / highway) 39 / 51 MPG
    (6.1 / 4.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
    Consumption (city / highway) 33 / 45 MPG
    (7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford S-MAX MPG

      • average 2010 Ford S-MAX MPG: 35 MPG / 7.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2010 Ford S-MAX MPG: 20 MPG / 11.5 L per 100 km
      • best 2010 Ford S-MAX MPG: 48 MPG / 4.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1733 kg / 3821 lbs
      • body type: MPV
      • difference highway / city: 34%
      • average engine power: 126 kW / 171 hp
      • difference from world average: 9% better
      • max distance with full tank: 836 miles (1346 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2010 Ford S-MAX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2010 Ford S-MAX MPG is between 20 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 Duratec Durashift — 21 to 37 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 20 to 36 MPG
  • 1.6 Duratorq TDCi — 40 to 48 MPG
  • 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi — 25 to 41 MPG
  • 2.0 Duratorq TDCi — 32 to 45 MPG
  • 2.2 Duratorq TDCi — 25 to 41 MPG


    2010 Ford S-MAX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2010 Ford S-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 Duratec Durashift — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 59 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 Duratorq TDCi — 38 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Duratorq TDCi — 43 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Duratorq TDCi — 53 kg/mpg


    2010 Ford S-MAX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2010 Ford S-MAX MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 Duratec Durashift is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBoost is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 Duratorq TDCi is 41% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 Duratorq TDCi is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 Duratorq TDCi is 3% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2010 Ford S-MAX (facelift 2010) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 Duratec Durashift 21 / 37 MPG
    (11.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBoost 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 Duratorq TDCi 40 / 48 MPG
    (5.9 / 4.9 L per 100 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% better 746—870 miles
    (1200—1400 km)     		0.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 EcoBoost SCTi 25 / 41 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Duratorq TDCi 32 / 45 MPG
    (7.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Duratorq TDCi 25 / 41 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2010 Ford S-MAX (facelift 2010) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 Duratec Durashift
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 37 MPG
    (11.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 Duratorq TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 40 / 48 MPG
    (5.9 / 4.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% better
    Driving range (full tank) 746—870 miles (1200—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 41 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Duratorq TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 32 / 45 MPG
    (7.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 41 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford S-MAX MPG

      • average 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG: 34 MPG / 8.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG: 17 MPG / 14.1 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG: 45 MPG / 5.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1681 kg / 3707 lbs
      • body type: minivan
      • difference highway / city: 40%
      • average engine power: 119 kW / 161 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% better
      • max distance with full tank: 702 miles (1129 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2005 Ford S-MAX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Ford S-MAX MPG is between 17 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 TDCi — 30 to 45 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V — 21 to 37 MPG
  • 2.0 TDCi — 29 to 44 MPG
  • 2.2 TDCi — 26 to 45 MPG
  • 2.3 T — 17 to 34 MPG
  • 2.5 i 20V — 18 to 33 MPG


    2005 Ford S-MAX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 TDCi — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TDCi — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 TDCi — 48 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 T — 64 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 i 20V — 67 kg/mpg


    2005 Ford S-MAX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 TDCi is 19% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TDCi is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 TDCi is 13% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 T is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 i 20V is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 TDCi 30 / 45 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 21 / 37 MPG
    (11 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TDCi 29 / 44 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 TDCi 26 / 45 MPG
    (9 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 T 17 / 34 MPG
    (14.1 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 i 20V 18 / 33 MPG
    (13.3 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Ford S-MAX MPG

    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 45 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 37 MPG
    (11 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 44 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 45 MPG
    (9 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 34 MPG
    (14.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 i 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 33 MPG
    (13.3 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings