2019 Ranger IV Raptor (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCab (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCrew (Americas)
2019 Ranger III Regular Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Raptor (facelift 2019)
2015 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Single Cab (facelift 2015)
Ranger III Double Cab
Ranger III Super Cab
2009 Ranger II Super Cab (facelift 2009)
2009 Ranger II Double Cab (facelift 2009)
2006 Ranger II Super Cab
2006 Ranger II Double Cab
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0d |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0d |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 EcoBoost |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 31% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 EcoBoost |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 31% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is between 22 MPG and 38 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Ford Ranger MPG is 33 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Ford Ranger MPG is between 21 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TDCi |
25
/
34 MPG
(9.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 TDCi |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.4 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
34 MPG
(9.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.4 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Ford Ranger MPG is between 21 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 TDCi |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.2 TDCi |
30
/
36 MPG
(7.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
36 MPG
(7.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Ford Ranger MPG is between 25 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TDCi |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 TDCi |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
4.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.2 L per 100 km / person |
Ranger Ford Ranger MPG is between 17 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The Ranger Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Ranger Ford Ranger MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TDCi |
28
/
33 MPG
(8.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
621—684 miles
(1000—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.5 |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 TDCi |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
33 MPG
(8.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—684 miles (1000—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Ranger Ford Ranger MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The Ranger Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Ranger Ford Ranger MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.2 TDCi |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 TDCi |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Ford Ranger MPG is 30 MPG on engine:
The 2009 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Ford Ranger MPG is 30 MPG on engine:
The 2009 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Ford Ranger MPG is between 19 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Ford Ranger MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 TDCi |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.6 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.5 TDCi |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.6 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Ford Ranger MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2006 Ford Ranger MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 TDCi |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.6 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
- | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.6 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
