cat_logo
HomeFord

Mustang

Ford Mustang MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford Mustang MPG by Years

Ford Mustang MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

    • average 2017 Ford Mustang MPG: 20 MPG / 12.6 L per 100 km
    • worst 2017 Ford Mustang MPG: 14 MPG / 16.8 L per 100 km
    • best 2017 Ford Mustang MPG: 31 MPG / 7.5 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1746 kg / 3850 lbs
    • body type: coupe
    • difference highway / city: 37%
    • average engine power: 339 kW / 460 hp
    • difference from world average: 37% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 403 miles (649 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2017 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2017 Ford Mustang MPG is between 14 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:

  • Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8 — 14 to 21 MPG
  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 15 to 25 MPG
  • 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost — 21 to 31 MPG
  • Shelby GT350 5.2 V8 — 14 to 21 MPG
  • BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 15 to 25 MPG


    2017 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 2017 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8 — 104 kg/mpg
  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 93 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost — 64 kg/mpg
  • Shelby GT350 5.2 V8 — 107 kg/mpg
  • BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 97 kg/mpg


    2017 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2017 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.

  • Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8 is 50% less economical than average car
  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost is 22% less economical than average car
  • Shelby GT350 5.2 V8 is 50% less economical than average car
  • BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2017 Ford Mustang VI (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8 14 / 21 MPG
    (16.8 / 11.2 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 50% worse 249—311 miles
    (400—500 km)     		7.4 L per 100 km / person
    GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 GTDi EcoBoost 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Shelby GT350 5.2 V8 14 / 21 MPG
    (16.8 / 11.2 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 50% worse 249—311 miles
    (400—500 km)     		7.4 L per 100 km / person
    BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2017 Ford Mustang VI (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle Shelby GT350 R 5.2 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 21 MPG
    (16.8 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—311 miles (400—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 7.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle Shelby GT350 5.2 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 21 MPG
    (16.8 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—311 miles (400—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 7.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle BULLITT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 2017 Ford Mustang MPG: 21 MPG / 11 L per 100 km
      • worst 2017 Ford Mustang MPG: 15 MPG / 15.6 L per 100 km
      • best 2017 Ford Mustang MPG: 31 MPG / 7.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1684 kg / 3713 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 283 kW / 385 hp
      • difference from world average: 34% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 403 miles (649 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2017 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2017 Ford Mustang MPG is between 15 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:

  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 15 to 25 MPG
  • 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost — 21 to 31 MPG


    2017 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 2017 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 98 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost — 67 kg/mpg


    2017 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2017 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2017 Ford Mustang Convertible VI (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 GTDi EcoBoost 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2017 Ford Mustang Convertible VI (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 GTDi EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 2015 Ford Mustang MPG: 21 MPG / 11.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2015 Ford Mustang MPG: 15 MPG / 15.7 L per 100 km
      • best 2015 Ford Mustang MPG: 30 MPG / 7.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1599 kg / 3526 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 37%
      • average engine power: 270 kW / 367 hp
      • difference from world average: 34% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 386 miles (622 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2015 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2015 Ford Mustang MPG is between 15 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.3 EcoBoost — 21 to 30 MPG
  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 17 to 25 MPG
  • GT 5.0 V8 — 15 to 25 MPG
  • 3.7 V6 — 17 to 28 MPG


    2015 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 2015 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3 EcoBoost — 69 kg/mpg
  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 87 kg/mpg
  • GT 5.0 V8 — 88 kg/mpg
  • 3.7 V6 — 76 kg/mpg


    2015 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2015 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 EcoBoost is 25% less economical than average car
  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 is 37% less economical than average car
  • GT 5.0 V8 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.7 V6 is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2015 Ford Mustang VI MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 EcoBoost 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3 L per 100 km / person
    GT 5.0 V8 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person
    3.7 V6 17 / 28 MPG
    (13.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2015 Ford Mustang VI MPG

    Vehicle 2.3 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle GT 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.7 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 28 MPG
    (13.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 2015 Ford Mustang MPG: 21 MPG / 11.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 2015 Ford Mustang MPG: 15 MPG / 15.7 L per 100 km
      • best 2015 Ford Mustang MPG: 30 MPG / 7.8 L per 100 km
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 34%
      • average engine power: 270 kW / 367 hp
      • difference from world average: 34% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 386 miles (622 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2015 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2015 Ford Mustang MPG is between 15 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:

  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 16 to 23 MPG
  • 2.3 EcoBoost — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 3.7 V6 — 19 to 28 MPG
  • GT 5.0 V8 — 15 to 24 MPG


    2015 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 2015 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 — 100 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 EcoBoost — 72 kg/mpg


    2015 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2015 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 EcoBoost is 25% less economical than average car
  • 3.7 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • GT 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2015 Ford Mustang Convertible VI MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 16 / 23 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 EcoBoost 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    3.7 V6 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		- 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    GT 5.0 V8 15 / 24 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km)     		- 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2015 Ford Mustang Convertible VI MPG

    Vehicle GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 23 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.7 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle GT 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 24 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 2005 Ford Mustang MPG: 21 MPG / 11.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Ford Mustang MPG: 14 MPG / 17 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Ford Mustang MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1565 kg / 3451 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 189 kW / 257 hp
      • difference from world average: 34% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 428 miles (689 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Ford Mustang MPG is between 14 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.0 i V6 — 20 to 26 MPG
  • 4.0i V6 12V — 19 to 28 MPG
  • 4.0i V6 — 17 to 29 MPG
  • GT 4.6i V8 — 14 to 17 MPG


    2005 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.0i V6 12V — 67 kg/mpg
  • 4.0i V6 — 71 kg/mpg
  • GT 4.6i V8 — 104 kg/mpg


    2005 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 4.0 i V6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 4.0i V6 12V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 4.0i V6 is 34% less economical than average car
  • GT 4.6i V8 is 53% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Ford Mustang V MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.0 i V6 20 / 26 MPG
    (12 / 9 L per 100 km)     		- 28% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    4.0i V6 12V 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    4.0i V6 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person
    GT 4.6i V8 14 / 17 MPG
    (17 / 13.6 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 53% worse 249—249 miles
    (400—400 km)     		3.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Ford Mustang V MPG

    Vehicle 4.0 i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 26 MPG
    (12 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.0i V6 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.0i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle GT 4.6i V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 17 MPG
    (17 / 13.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 53% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—249 miles (400—400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 2005 Ford Mustang MPG: 20 MPG / 11.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Ford Mustang MPG: 17 MPG / 13.9 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Ford Mustang MPG: 25 MPG / 9.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1685 kg / 3715 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 25%
      • average engine power: 190 kW / 258 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 336 miles (540 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Ford Mustang MPG is between 17 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.0 i V6 12V — 19 to 23 MPG
  • 4.6 i V8 24V — 17 to 25 MPG


    2005 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.0 i V6 12V — 77 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 i V8 24V — 84 kg/mpg


    2005 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 4.0 i V6 12V is 34% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 i V8 24V is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Ford Mustang Convertible V MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.0 i V6 12V 19 / 23 MPG
    (12.4 / 10.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 i V8 24V 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.9 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Ford Mustang Convertible V MPG

    Vehicle 4.0 i V6 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 23 MPG
    (12.4 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 i V8 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.9 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 1994 Ford Mustang MPG: 20 MPG / 12.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 1994 Ford Mustang MPG: 13 MPG / 18 L per 100 km
      • best 1994 Ford Mustang MPG: 30 MPG / 7.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1550 kg / 3418 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 215 kW / 292 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 370 miles (596 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1994 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1994 Ford Mustang MPG is between 13 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R — 16 to 22 MPG
  • 4.6 V8 32V Cobra — 13 to 24 MPG
  • 3.8 V6 — 20 to 30 MPG
  • 4.6 V8 GT — 17 to 24 MPG


    1994 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 1994 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R — 92 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 V8 32V Cobra — 95 kg/mpg
  • 3.8 V6 — 61 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 V8 GT — 78 kg/mpg


    1994 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1994 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R is 41% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 V8 32V Cobra is 47% less economical than average car
  • 3.8 V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 V8 GT is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1994 Ford Mustang Convertible IV MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R 16 / 22 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		6.4 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 V8 32V Cobra 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		7 L per 100 km / person
    3.8 V6 20 / 30 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		5 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 V8 GT 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		5.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1994 Ford Mustang Convertible IV MPG

    Vehicle 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 22 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 6.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 V8 32V Cobra
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.8 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 30 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 V8 GT
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 1994 Ford Mustang MPG: 20 MPG / 11.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1994 Ford Mustang MPG: 13 MPG / 18 L per 100 km
      • best 1994 Ford Mustang MPG: 30 MPG / 7.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1530 kg / 3374 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 217 kW / 296 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 370 miles (596 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1994 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1994 Ford Mustang MPG is between 13 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.8 V6 — 20 to 30 MPG
  • 4.6i V8 32V Mach I — 17 to 25 MPG
  • 4.6 V8 32V Cobra — 13 to 24 MPG
  • 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R — 16 to 22 MPG
  • 4.6 V8 Cobra — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 4.6 V8 GT — 17 to 24 MPG


    1994 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 1994 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.8 V6 — 58 kg/mpg
  • 4.6i V8 32V Mach I — 80 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 V8 32V Cobra — 90 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R — 88 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 V8 Cobra — 74 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 V8 GT — 77 kg/mpg


    1994 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1994 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.8 V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 4.6i V8 32V Mach I is 37% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 V8 32V Cobra is 47% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R is 41% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 V8 Cobra is 34% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 V8 GT is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1994 Ford Mustang IV MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.8 V6 20 / 30 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		5 L per 100 km / person
    4.6i V8 32V Mach I 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.9 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		5.9 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 V8 32V Cobra 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		7 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R 16 / 22 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		6.4 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 V8 Cobra 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		5.7 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 V8 GT 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		5.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1994 Ford Mustang IV MPG

    Vehicle 3.8 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 30 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6i V8 32V Mach I
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.9 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 V8 32V Cobra
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 22 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 6.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 V8 Cobra
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 V8 GT
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 1979 Ford Mustang MPG: 20 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 1979 Ford Mustang MPG: 12 MPG / 20 L per 100 km
      • best 1979 Ford Mustang MPG: 26 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1380 kg / 3043 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 123 kW / 167 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 313 miles (504 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1979 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1979 Ford Mustang MPG is between 12 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.3i — 17 to 26 MPG
  • 4.9 V8 — 12 to 20 MPG


    1979 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 1979 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3i — 67 kg/mpg
  • 4.9 V8 — 92 kg/mpg


    1979 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1979 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3i is 37% less economical than average car
  • 4.9 V8 is 53% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1979 Ford Mustang Convertible III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3i 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		5.8 L per 100 km / person
    4.9 V8 12 / 20 MPG
    (20 / 12 L per 100 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 53% worse 186—311 miles
    (300—500 km)     		8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1979 Ford Mustang Convertible III MPG

    Vehicle 2.3i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.9 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 12 / 20 MPG
    (20 / 12 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 53% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—311 miles (300—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Mustang MPG

      • average 1979 Ford Mustang MPG: 20 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 1979 Ford Mustang MPG: 12 MPG / 20 L per 100 km
      • best 1979 Ford Mustang MPG: 26 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1250 kg / 2756 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 123 kW / 167 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 313 miles (504 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1979 Ford Mustang MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1979 Ford Mustang MPG is between 12 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.9 V8 — 12 to 20 MPG
  • 2.3i — 17 to 26 MPG


    1979 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio

    The 1979 Ford Mustang MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.9 V8 — 92 kg/mpg
  • 2.3i — 63 kg/mpg


    1979 Ford Mustang MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1979 Ford Mustang MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 4.9 V8 is 53% less economical than average car
  • 2.3i is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1979 Ford Mustang III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.9 V8 12 / 20 MPG
    (20 / 12 L per 100 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 53% worse 186—311 miles
    (300—500 km)     		8 L per 100 km / person
    2.3i 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		5.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1979 Ford Mustang III MPG

    Vehicle 4.9 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 12 / 20 MPG
    (20 / 12 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 53% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—311 miles (300—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.8 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings