2016 Ford Kuga MPG is between 21 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Ford Kuga MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Ford Kuga MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDCI |
44
/
55 MPG
(5.4 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCI |
46
/
51 MPG
(5.1 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
746—808 miles
(1200—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 EcoBoost |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
55 MPG
(5.4 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
46
/
51 MPG
(5.1 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—808 miles (1200—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Ford Kuga MPG is between 23 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Ford Kuga MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Ford Kuga MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 EcoBoost |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDCi |
32
/
43 MPG
(7.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
43 MPG
(7.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Ford Kuga MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
The 2010 Ford Kuga MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Ford Kuga MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
32
/
43 MPG
(7.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
-
|
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
43 MPG
(7.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Ford Kuga MPG is between 16 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Ford Kuga MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Ford Kuga MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDCi |
29
/
44 MPG
(8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
-
|
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i 20V |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |