cat_logo
HomeFord

Galaxy

Ford Galaxy MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford Galaxy MPG by Years

Ford Galaxy MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Ford Galaxy MPG

    • average 2015 Ford Galaxy MPG: 36 MPG / 6.8 L per 100 km
    • worst 2015 Ford Galaxy MPG: 23 MPG / 10.3 L per 100 km
    • best 2015 Ford Galaxy MPG: 46 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1766 kg / 3894 lbs
    • body type: minivan
    • difference highway / city: 27%
    • average engine power: 154 kW / 209 hp
    • difference from world average: 13% better
    • max distance with full tank: 791 miles (1273 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

2015 Ford Galaxy MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2015 Ford Galaxy MPG is between 23 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.5 EcoBoost — 26 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 23 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 TDCi — 37 to 46 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo — 32 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 EcoBlue — 34 to 43 MPG


    2015 Ford Galaxy MPG to weight ratio

    The 2015 Ford Galaxy MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.5 EcoBoost — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBoost — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TDCi — 40 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 EcoBlue — 45 kg/mpg


    2015 Ford Galaxy MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2015 Ford Galaxy MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.5 EcoBoost is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBoost is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TDCi is 34% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 EcoBlue is 22% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2015 Ford Galaxy III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.5 EcoBoost 26 / 36 MPG
    (9 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBoost 23 / 36 MPG
    (10.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TDCi 37 / 46 MPG
    (6.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% better 684—870 miles
    (1100—1400 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo 32 / 44 MPG
    (7.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 621—808 miles
    (1000—1300 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 EcoBlue 34 / 43 MPG
    (7 / 5.5 L per 100 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 621—808 miles
    (1000—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2015 Ford Galaxy III MPG

    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 36 MPG
    (9 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 36 MPG
    (10.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 37 / 46 MPG
    (6.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 32 / 44 MPG
    (7.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue
    Consumption (city / highway) 34 / 43 MPG
    (7 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Galaxy MPG

      • average 2006 Ford Galaxy MPG: 33 MPG / 7.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 2006 Ford Galaxy MPG: 17 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2006 Ford Galaxy MPG: 44 MPG / 5.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1625 kg / 3583 lbs
      • body type: minivan
      • difference highway / city: 38%
      • average engine power: 109 kW / 149 hp
      • difference from world average: 3% better
      • max distance with full tank: 649 miles (1045 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2006 Ford Galaxy MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2006 Ford Galaxy MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 TDCi — 29 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V — 21 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 TDCi — 29 to 43 MPG
  • 2.0 — 24 to 40 MPG
  • 2.2 TDCi — 26 to 44 MPG
  • 2.3 i 16V — 17 to 31 MPG


    2006 Ford Galaxy MPG to weight ratio

    The 2006 Ford Galaxy MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 TDCi — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TDCi — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 TDCi — 50 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i 16V — 68 kg/mpg


    2006 Ford Galaxy MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2006 Ford Galaxy MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 TDCi is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TDCi is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 0% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 TDCi is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 i 16V is 25% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2006 Ford Galaxy II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 TDCi 29 / 44 MPG
    (8 / 5.3 L per 100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 21 / 36 MPG
    (11.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TDCi 29 / 43 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 24 / 40 MPG
    (10 / 5.9 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 TDCi 26 / 44 MPG
    (9.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i 16V 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2006 Ford Galaxy II MPG

    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 44 MPG
    (8 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 36 MPG
    (11.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 43 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 40 MPG
    (10 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 44 MPG
    (9.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Galaxy MPG

      • average 1995 Ford Galaxy MPG: 27 MPG / 11 L per 100 km
      • worst 1995 Ford Galaxy MPG: 13 MPG / 17.8 L per 100 km
      • best 1995 Ford Galaxy MPG: 43 MPG / 5.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1835 kg / 4046 lbs
      • body type: minivan
      • difference highway / city: 43%
      • average engine power: 116 kW / 157 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 717 miles (1154 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1995 Ford Galaxy MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1995 Ford Galaxy MPG is between 13 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.8i V6 — 14 to 27 MPG
  • 1.9 TDI — 28 to 43 MPG
  • 2.3 16V — 17 to 30 MPG
  • 2.8 V6 — 16 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 i — 17 to 30 MPG
  • 2.8i V6 4x4 — 13 to 24 MPG


    1995 Ford Galaxy MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Ford Galaxy MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.8i V6 — 94 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TDI — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 16V — 70 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 V6 — 77 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i — 72 kg/mpg
  • 2.8i V6 4x4 — 108 kg/mpg


    1995 Ford Galaxy MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Ford Galaxy MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.8i V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TDI is 13% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 16V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.8i V6 4x4 is 47% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Ford Galaxy (WGR) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.8i V6 14 / 27 MPG
    (16.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TDI 28 / 43 MPG
    (8.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 16V 17 / 30 MPG
    (14 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 V6 16 / 28 MPG
    (14.8 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.8i V6 4x4 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Ford Galaxy (WGR) MPG

    Vehicle 2.8i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 27 MPG
    (16.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 43 MPG
    (8.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (14 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 28 MPG
    (14.8 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8i V6 4x4
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings