2018 Ford Fusion MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Ford Fusion MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Ford Fusion MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 Duratec |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 EcoBoost |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 EcoBoost |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
44
/
41 MPG
(5.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
621—559 miles
(1000—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
- | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
41 MPG
(5.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—559 miles (1000—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Ford Fusion MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Ford Fusion MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Ford Fusion MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 EcoBoost |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 EcoBoost |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
44
/
41 MPG
(5.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
621—559 miles
(1000—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
32 MPG
(11.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
41 MPG
(5.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—559 miles (1000—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Ford Fusion MPG is between 23 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Ford Fusion MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Ford Fusion MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 TDCi |
45
/
60 MPG
(5.2 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDCi |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
60 MPG
(5.2 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Ford Fusion MPG is between 23 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Ford Fusion MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Ford Fusion MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TDCi |
45
/
60 MPG
(5.2 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 Duratec |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratec |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDCi |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
60 MPG
(5.2 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |