Ford Flex MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford Flex MPG by Years

- average 2013 Ford Flex MPG: 19 MPG / 12.7 L per 100 km
- worst 2013 Ford Flex MPG: 16 MPG / 14.7 L per 100 km
- best 2013 Ford Flex MPG: 23 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
- body type: SUV
- difference highway / city: 30%
- average engine power: 268 kW / 364 hp
- difference from world average: 41% worse
- max distance with full tank: 337 miles (542 km)
- Fuelson rating: 4 / 10

2013 Ford Flex MPG is 23 MPG on engine:

3.5 V6 — 16 to 23 MPG

We calculated that 2013 Ford Flex MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

3.5 V6 is 44% less economical than average car

Vehicle	Consumption (city / highway)	Consumption to weight ratio	Difference from world average consumption	Driving range (full tank)	Consumption per passenger
3.5 V6	16 / 23 MPG (14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km)	-	44% worse	311—435 miles (500—700 km)	2.2 L per 100 km / person

Vehicle	3.5 V6
Consumption (city / highway)	16 / 23 MPG (14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	-
Difference from world average consumption	44% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—435 miles (500—700 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.2 L per 100 km / person

- average 2009 Ford Flex MPG: 19 MPG / 12.9 L per 100 km
- worst 2009 Ford Flex MPG: 14 MPG / 16.8 L per 100 km
- best 2009 Ford Flex MPG: 24 MPG / 9.8 L per 100 km
- body type: SUV
- difference highway / city: 35%
- average engine power: 227 kW / 309 hp
- difference from world average: 41% worse
- max distance with full tank: 356 miles (573 km)
- Fuelson rating: 4 / 10

2009 Ford Flex MPG is between 14 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:

3.5 V6 — 14 to 22 MPG

3.5 — 17 to 24 MPG

The 2009 Ford Flex MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

3.5 V6 — 124 kg/mpg

We calculated that 2009 Ford Flex MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

3.5 V6 is 47% less economical than average car

3.5 is 41% less economical than average car

Vehicle	Consumption (city / highway)	Consumption to weight ratio	Difference from world average consumption	Driving range (full tank)	Consumption per passenger
3.5 V6	14 / 22 MPG (16.8 / 10.7 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	47% worse	249—435 miles (400—700 km)	2.3 L per 100 km / person
3.5	17 / 24 MPG (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)	-	41% worse	311—435 miles (500—700 km)	2.1 L per 100 km / person

Vehicle	3.5 V6
Consumption (city / highway)	14 / 22 MPG (16.8 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	47% worse
Driving range (full tank)	249—435 miles (400—700 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.3 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	3.5
Consumption (city / highway)	17 / 24 MPG (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	-
Difference from world average consumption	41% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—435 miles (500—700 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.1 L per 100 km / person