2018 Fiesta Active
2017 Fiesta VIII (Mk8)
Fiesta VII Sedan (Mk7)
2013 Fiesta VII (Mk7, facelift 2013)
2009 Fiesta VII (Mk7)
2005 Fiesta (Mk6, 3 door facelift 2005)
2003 Fiesta VI (Mk6, 5 door)
1999 Fiesta V (Mk5, 3 door)
1999 Fiesta V (Mk5, 5 door)
1996 Fiesta IV (Mk4, 3 door)
1996 Fiesta IV (Mk4, 5 door)
1989 Fiesta III (Mk3)
1983 Fiesta II (Mk2)
2018 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 40 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
40
/
53 MPG
(5.9 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
49
/
57 MPG
(4.8 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
53 MPG
(5.9 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
57 MPG
(4.8 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 31 MPG and 78 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 132% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCI |
67
/
78 MPG
(3.5 / 3 L per 100 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 132% better |
746—870 miles
(1200—1400 km) |
0.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 |
42
/
64 MPG
(5.6 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
57
/
76 MPG
(4.1 / 3.1 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 110% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
ST 1.5 EcoBoost |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
67
/
78 MPG
(3.5 / 3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 132% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—870 miles (1200—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
64 MPG
(5.6 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
57
/
76 MPG
(4.1 / 3.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 110% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | ST 1.5 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Fiesta Ford Fiesta MPG is 52 MPG on engine:
The Fiesta Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Fiesta Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
28
/
52 MPG
(8.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
52 MPG
(8.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 30 MPG and 76 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 122% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
30
/
49 MPG
(7.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.25 Duratec |
35
/
56 MPG
(6.8 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 41% better |
-
|
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 Duratec |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 60% better |
-
|
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 EcoBoost |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.3 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 72% better |
-
|
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDCi |
62
/
76 MPG
(3.8 / 3.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 122% better |
-
|
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
53
/
71 MPG
(4.4 / 3.3 L per 100 km) |
- | 100% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
49 MPG
(7.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
56 MPG
(6.8 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.3 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
62
/
76 MPG
(3.8 / 3.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 122% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
53
/
71 MPG
(4.4 / 3.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 100% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 26 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.25 |
31
/
51 MPG
(7.5 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
26
/
46 MPG
(8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
28
/
52 MPG
(8.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
- | 25% better |
-
|
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 Duratec |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.6 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
51 MPG
(7.5 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
46 MPG
(8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
52 MPG
(8.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.6 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 23 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ST 2.0 Duratec HE |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
45
/
60 MPG
(5.2 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 Duratec HE |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.4 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
60 MPG
(5.2 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 26 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 Duratec |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 TDCi |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.3 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.25 Duratec |
27
/
48 MPG
(8.6 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 Duratec |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratec |
26
/
45 MPG
(9.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.3 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
48 MPG
(8.6 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
45 MPG
(9.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 25 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.25i 16V |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 D |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V Sport |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 DI |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V Sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 DI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 26 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.25i 16V |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 DI |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 D |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 DI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 25 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.25i 16V |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 D |
39
/
56 MPG
(6 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 i 16V |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.6 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
56 MPG
(6 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.6 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 27 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i |
27
/
40 MPG
(8.7 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.25i 16V |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 D |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
40 MPG
(8.7 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Ford Fiesta MPG is between 23 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 |
35
/
43 MPG
(6.7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
38 MPG
(9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 D |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 XR2i 16V |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
43 MPG
(6.7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 XR2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1983 Ford Fiesta MPG is 38 MPG on engine:
The 1983 Ford Fiesta MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1983 Ford Fiesta MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 XR2 |
26
/
38 MPG
(9.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 XR2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(9.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |