2018 F-150 XIII SuperCab (facelift 2018)
2018 F-150 XIII Regular Cab (facelift 2018)
2018 F-150 XIII SuperCrew (facelift 2018)
2015 F-150 XIII Regular Cab
2015 F-150 XIII SuperCrew
2009 F-150 XII Regular Cab
2009 F-150 XII SuperCab
2009 F-150 XII SuperCrew
2004 F-150 XI Regular Cab
2004 F-150 XI SuperCab
2004 F-150 XI SuperCrew
1999 F-150 X SuperCrew
1992 F-150 IX Regular Cab
2018 Ford F-150 MPG is between 15 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raptor 3.5 V6 |
15
/
18 MPG
(15.7 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 V6 |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 37% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
17
/
21 MPG
(13.8 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 41% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 44% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Raptor 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
18 MPG
(15.7 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
21 MPG
(13.8 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Ford F-150 MPG is between 16 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 2018 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 37% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 44% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Ford F-150 MPG is between 15 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raptor 3.5 V6 |
15
/
18 MPG
(15.7 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 V6 |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 37% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 41% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 44% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Raptor 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
18 MPG
(15.7 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Ford F-150 MPG is between 15 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
4.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.6 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Ford F-150 MPG is between 15 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 V6 |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Ford F-150 MPG is between 10 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 66% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 50% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
4.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.4 V8 |
10
/
13 MPG
(23.5 / 18.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 66% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
6.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.7 V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
4.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
4.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
13 MPG
(23.5 / 18.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 6.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.6 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Ford F-150 MPG is between 10 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 66% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 50% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.4 V8 |
10
/
13 MPG
(23.5 / 18.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 66% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
4.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.7 V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
13 MPG
(23.5 / 18.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Ford F-150 MPG is between 13 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 50% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.4 V8 |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.7 V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
6.2 V8 |
13
/
18 MPG
(18.1 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
18 MPG
(18.1 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Ford F-150 MPG is between 14 MPG and 20 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.4 V8 Triton |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
5 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 V8 Triton |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
5 L per 100 km / person |
4.2 V6 |
16
/
20 MPG
(14.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
20 MPG
(14.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Ford F-150 MPG is between 14 MPG and 19 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 Triton |
15
/
19 MPG
(15.7 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
5.4 V8 Triton |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
19 MPG
(15.7 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Ford F-150 MPG is between 14 MPG and 20 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 Triton |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
5.4 V8 Triton |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 Triton |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.4 V8 Triton |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Ford F-150 MPG is 18 MPG on engine:
The 1999 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harley-Davidson 5.4 V8 |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Harley-Davidson 5.4 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Ford F-150 MPG is 16 MPG on engine:
The 1992 Ford F-150 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Ford F-150 MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVT Lightning 5.8 V8 |
12
/
16 MPG
(19.6 / 14.7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
-
|
8.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | SVT Lightning 5.8 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
16 MPG
(19.6 / 14.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 8.6 L per 100 km / person |