2020 Ford Explorer MPG is 102 MPG on engine:
The 2020 Ford Explorer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 154% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
71
/
102 MPG
(3.3 / 2.3 L per 100 km) |
8.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 154% better |
1305—1864 miles
(2100—3000 km) |
0.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
71
/
102 MPG
(3.3 / 2.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 8.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 154% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 1305—1864 miles (2100—3000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.4 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Ford Explorer MPG is between 16 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Ford Explorer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 Ti-VCT V6 |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 EcoBoost |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.3 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 EcoBoost V6 |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 Ti-VCT V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.3 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 EcoBoost V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Ford Explorer MPG is between 16 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 2016 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 Ti VCT V6 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 GTDI V6 EcoBoost |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 44% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 Ti VCT V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 GTDI V6 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Ford Explorer MPG is between 11 MPG and 21 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Ford Explorer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 60% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0i V6 |
16
/
21 MPG
(14.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i V6 12V 4WD FFV |
11
/
15 MPG
(21.4 / 15.7 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac |
16
/
21 MPG
(14.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i V6 4WD |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac 4WD |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 i V8 24V AWD |
14
/
20 MPG
(16.8 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 i V8 24V |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
21 MPG
(14.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V 4WD FFV |
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
15 MPG
(21.4 / 15.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
21 MPG
(14.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 24V AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
20 MPG
(16.8 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Ford Explorer MPG is between 14 MPG and 20 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Ford Explorer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6i V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.6i V8 4WD |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 V6 |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6i V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6i V8 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
20 MPG
(15.7 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Ford Explorer MPG is between 13 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Ford Explorer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 XL |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.3 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 XL 4WD |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.9 XL |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 XLT 4WD |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.9 XL 4WD |
14
/
17 MPG
(17 / 13.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 XL |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.3 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 XL 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.9 XL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 XLT 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.9 XL 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
17 MPG
(17 / 13.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Ford Explorer MPG is 20 MPG on engine:
The 1991 Ford Explorer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Ford Explorer MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
14
/
20 MPG
(17 / 11.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
20 MPG
(17 / 11.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |