Ford Everest MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford Everest MPG by Years

Ford Everest MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Ford Everest MPG

    • average 2018 Ford Everest MPG: 32 MPG / 7.5 L per 100 km
    • worst 2018 Ford Everest MPG: 24 MPG / 9.7 L per 100 km
    • best 2018 Ford Everest MPG: 43 MPG / 5.5 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 2283 kg / 5034 lbs
    • body type: SUV
    • difference highway / city: 31%
    • average engine power: 150 kW / 204 hp
    • difference from world average: 0%
    • max distance with full tank: 720 miles (1159 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

2018 Ford Everest MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2018 Ford Everest MPG is between 24 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 — 30 to 43 MPG
  • 3.2 DuratorqTDCi — 24 to 35 MPG

    2018 Ford Everest MPG to weight ratio

    The 2018 Ford Everest MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 — 68 kg/mpg
  • 3.2 DuratorqTDCi — 82 kg/mpg

    2018 Ford Everest MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2018 Ford Everest MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 is 6% more economical than average car
  • 3.2 DuratorqTDCi is 13% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2018 Ford Everest III (facelift 2018) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 30 / 43 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 621—932 miles
    (1000—1500 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.2 DuratorqTDCi 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2018 Ford Everest III (facelift 2018) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 43 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.2 DuratorqTDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford Everest MPG

      • average 2015 Ford Everest MPG: 30 MPG / 8.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2015 Ford Everest MPG: 24 MPG / 9.7 L per 100 km
      • best 2015 Ford Everest MPG: 35 MPG / 6.7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2239-2305 kg / 4937 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 143 kW / 195 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 592 miles (952 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2015 Ford Everest MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2015 Ford Everest MPG is 35 MPG on engine:

  • 3.2 Duratorq TDCi — 24 to 35 MPG

    2015 Ford Everest MPG to weight ratio

    The 2015 Ford Everest MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.2 Duratorq TDCi — 80 kg/mpg

    2015 Ford Everest MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2015 Ford Everest MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.2 Duratorq TDCi is 13% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2015 Ford Everest III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.2 Duratorq TDCi 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2015 Ford Everest III MPG

    Vehicle 3.2 Duratorq TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person