2020 Ford Escape MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
The 2020 Ford Escape MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Ford Escape MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5L |
43
/
37 MPG
(5.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
621—497 miles
(1000—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5L |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
37 MPG
(5.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—497 miles (1000—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Ford Escape MPG is between 20 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Ford Escape MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Ford Escape MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
22
/
28 MPG
(10.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 EcoBoost |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 Duratec |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
28 MPG
(10.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Ford Escape MPG is between 21 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Ford Escape MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Ford Escape MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBoost |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 EcoBoost |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 Duratec |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Ford Escape MPG is between 17 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Ford Escape MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Ford Escape MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 L |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.3 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 L |
17
/
30 MPG
(13.8 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 L |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.3 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 L |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
30 MPG
(13.8 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Ford Escape MPG is between 18 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Ford Escape MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Ford Escape MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3i 16V |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 25% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V XLS |
23
/
27 MPG
(10.2 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V XLS 4WD |
22
/
25 MPG
(10.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V Hybrid |
31
/
36 MPG
(7.6 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—559 miles
(800—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V Hybrid AWD |
29
/
33 MPG
(8.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V XLT |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V XLT 4WD |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V XLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
27 MPG
(10.2 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V XLS 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
25 MPG
(10.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V Hybrid |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
36 MPG
(7.6 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—559 miles (800—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V Hybrid AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
33 MPG
(8.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XLT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XLT 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |