Ford EcoSport MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Ford EcoSport MPG by Years

Ford EcoSport MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Ford EcoSport MPG

    • average 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG: 49 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
    • worst 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG: 33 MPG / 7.2 L per 100 km
    • best 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG: 62 MPG / 3.8 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1213 kg / 2675 lbs
    • body type: SUV
    • difference highway / city: 22%
    • average engine power: 83 kW / 113 hp
    • difference from world average: 53% better
    • max distance with full tank: 788 miles (1268 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

2017 Ford EcoSport MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2017 Ford EcoSport MPG is between 33 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.0 EcoBoost — 33 to 47 MPG
  • 1.5 TDCi — 52 to 62 MPG

    2017 Ford EcoSport MPG to weight ratio

    The 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.0 EcoBoost — 30 kg/mpg
  • 1.5 TDCi — 21 kg/mpg

    2017 Ford EcoSport MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG is up to 78% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.0 EcoBoost is 28% more economical than average car
  • 1.5 TDCi is 78% more economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2017 Ford EcoSport II (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.0 EcoBoost 33 / 47 MPG
    (7.2 / 5 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% better 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person
    1.5 TDCi 52 / 62 MPG
    (4.5 / 3.8 L per 100 km)
    3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 78% better 746—870 miles
    (1200—1400 km)
    0.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2017 Ford EcoSport II (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle 1.0 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 33 / 47 MPG
    (7.2 / 5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.5 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 52 / 62 MPG
    (4.5 / 3.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 78% better
    Driving range (full tank) 746—870 miles (1200—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Ford EcoSport MPG

      • average 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG: 46 MPG / 5.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG: 30 MPG / 7.9 L per 100 km
      • best 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG: 55 MPG / 4.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1384 kg / 3052 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 20%
      • average engine power: 78 kW / 106 hp
      • difference from world average: 44% better
      • max distance with full tank: 734 miles (1182 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

    2013 Ford EcoSport MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2013 Ford EcoSport MPG is between 30 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.0 EcoBoost — 36 to 50 MPG
  • 1.5 TDCi — 49 to 55 MPG
  • 1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT — 30 to 44 MPG
  • 1.5 Duratec TDCi — 48 to 53 MPG

    2013 Ford EcoSport MPG to weight ratio

    The 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.0 EcoBoost — 31 kg/mpg
  • 1.5 TDCi — 26 kg/mpg
  • 1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT — 37 kg/mpg
  • 1.5 Duratec TDCi — 27 kg/mpg

    2013 Ford EcoSport MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.0 EcoBoost is 37% more economical than average car
  • 1.5 TDCi is 66% more economical than average car
  • 1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT is 16% more economical than average car
  • 1.5 Duratec TDCi is 60% more economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2013 Ford EcoSport II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.0 EcoBoost 36 / 50 MPG
    (6.6 / 4.7 L per 100 km)
    2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% better 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.5 TDCi 49 / 55 MPG
    (4.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km)
    3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 66% better 684—746 miles
    (1100—1200 km)
    0.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT 30 / 44 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.5 Duratec TDCi 48 / 53 MPG
    (4.9 / 4.4 L per 100 km)
    3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 60% better 684—746 miles
    (1100—1200 km)
    0.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2013 Ford EcoSport II MPG

    Vehicle 1.0 EcoBoost
    Consumption (city / highway) 36 / 50 MPG
    (6.6 / 4.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.5 TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 49 / 55 MPG
    (4.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 66% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—746 miles (1100—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 44 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.5 Duratec TDCi
    Consumption (city / highway) 48 / 53 MPG
    (4.9 / 4.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 60% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—746 miles (1100—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.9 L per 100 km / person