2017 Ford EcoSport MPG is between 33 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Ford EcoSport MPG is up to 78% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
52
/
62 MPG
(4.5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 78% better |
746—870 miles
(1200—1400 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
52
/
62 MPG
(4.5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 78% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—870 miles (1200—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Ford EcoSport MPG is between 30 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Ford EcoSport MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
36
/
50 MPG
(6.6 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
49
/
55 MPG
(4.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
684—746 miles
(1100—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Duratec TDCi |
48
/
53 MPG
(4.9 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
684—746 miles
(1100—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
50 MPG
(6.6 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
55 MPG
(4.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—746 miles (1100—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Duratec Ti-VCT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Duratec TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
53 MPG
(4.9 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—746 miles (1100—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |