2003 Ford Crown Victoria MPG is between 18 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Ford Crown Victoria MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Ford Crown Victoria MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 32V |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 i V8 LX Sport |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 LX Sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Ford Crown Victoria MPG is between 15 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Ford Crown Victoria MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Ford Crown Victoria MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 i V8 LX Sport |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 LX Sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.7 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Ford Crown Victoria MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 1992 Ford Crown Victoria MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Ford Crown Victoria MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |