1995 Ford Contour MPG is between 21 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Ford Contour MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Ford Contour MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V GL |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i 24V GL |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i V6 24V LX |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V GL |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i 24V GL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 24V LX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |