2015 Ford C-MAX MPG is between 26 MPG and 67 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford C-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford C-MAX MPG is up to 93% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
38
/
52 MPG
(6.2 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 EcoBoost |
26
/
46 MPG
(8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
47
/
57 MPG
(5 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
684—808 miles
(1100—1300 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDCi |
43
/
53 MPG
(5.5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDCi |
44
/
59 MPG
(5.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 ECOnetic |
55
/
67 MPG
(4.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 93% better |
746—932 miles
(1200—1500 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
40
/
36 MPG
(5.9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
559—497 miles
(900—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
52 MPG
(6.2 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
46 MPG
(8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
57 MPG
(5 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
53 MPG
(5.5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
59 MPG
(5.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 ECOnetic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
55
/
67 MPG
(4.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 93% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—932 miles (1200—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
36 MPG
(5.9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—497 miles (900—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Ford C-MAX MPG is between 26 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Ford C-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Ford C-MAX MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 EcoBoost |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Ti-VCT |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 TDCi |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
746—932 miles
(1200—1500 km) |
0.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDCi |
41
/
53 MPG
(5.8 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDCi |
42
/
51 MPG
(5.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
684—808 miles
(1100—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—932 miles (1200—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
53 MPG
(5.8 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
51 MPG
(5.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Ford C-MAX MPG is between 28 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Ford C-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Ford C-MAX MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
44
/
59 MPG
(5.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
34
/
50 MPG
(6.9 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
59 MPG
(5.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
50 MPG
(6.9 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Ford C-MAX MPG is between 27 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Ford C-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Ford C-MAX MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
43
/
55 MPG
(5.5 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
33
/
48 MPG
(7.1 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
55 MPG
(5.5 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec Ti-VCT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
48 MPG
(7.1 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Ford C-MAX MPG is between 24 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Ford C-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Ford C-MAX MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDCI |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.6 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.6 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Ford C-MAX MPG is between 24 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Ford C-MAX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Ford C-MAX MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
24
/
42 MPG
(9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 0% |
-
|
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDCi |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
26
/
44 MPG
(8.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDCi |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(8.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |