2010 Punto Evo (199)
Punto Classic 3d
Punto Classic 5d
2006 Grande Punto (199)
2006 Punto III (199)
2003 Punto II (188, facelift 2003) 5dr
2003 Punto II (188, facelift 2003) 3dr
2000 Punto II (188) 3dr
2000 Punto II (188) 5dr
1997 Punto I (176, facelift 1997)
1994 Punto Cabrio (176C)
1994 Punto I (176)
2010 Fiat Punto MPG is between 31 MPG and 67 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 16V Multijet |
44
/
67 MPG
(5.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 8V |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 8V |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 16V MultiAir |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 16V T-jet MultiAir |
32
/
51 MPG
(7.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V Multijet |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 16V Multijet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
67 MPG
(5.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 8V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 8V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V MultiAir |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V T-jet MultiAir |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
51 MPG
(7.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Punto Fiat Punto MPG is between 33 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The Punto Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Punto Fiat Punto MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 Multijet |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Punto Fiat Punto MPG is between 33 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The Punto Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Punto Fiat Punto MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 Multijet |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Fiat Punto MPG is between 27 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 Multijet |
40
/
59 MPG
(5.9 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
35
/
47 MPG
(6.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Multijet |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 T-jet |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Multijet |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 1.9 Multijet |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
59 MPG
(5.9 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
47 MPG
(6.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 T-jet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 1.9 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Fiat Punto MPG is between 32 MPG and 67 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 TwinAir |
47
/
62 MPG
(5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 T-jet MultiAir |
32
/
51 MPG
(7.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 8V |
32
/
50 MPG
(7.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 Multijet |
44
/
67 MPG
(5.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 Easypower |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 8V |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 MultiAir |
32
/
50 MPG
(7.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 TwinAir |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
62 MPG
(5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 T-jet MultiAir |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
51 MPG
(7.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 8V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
50 MPG
(7.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
67 MPG
(5.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 Easypower |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 8V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 MultiAir |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
50 MPG
(7.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Fiat Punto MPG is between 30 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 Multijet |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
30
/
46 MPG
(7.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Multijet |
32
/
57 MPG
(7.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
46 MPG
(7.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
57 MPG
(7.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Fiat Punto MPG is between 20 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.6 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 Multijet |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
30
/
46 MPG
(7.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
HGT 1.8 |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Multijet |
32
/
57 MPG
(7.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.6 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
46 MPG
(7.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | HGT 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
57 MPG
(7.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Fiat Punto MPG is between 20 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
HGT 1.8 |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | HGT 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Fiat Punto MPG is between 32 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
59 MPG
(6.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Fiat Punto MPG is between 20 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
55 1.1 |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
75 1.2 |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.5 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
70 TD 1.7 |
28
/
48 MPG
(8.4 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
GT 1.4 Turbo |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
60 TD 1.7 |
26
/
46 MPG
(8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
85 1.2 |
25
/
45 MPG
(9.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 55 1.1 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 75 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.5 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 70 TD 1.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
48 MPG
(8.4 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 1.4 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 60 TD 1.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
46 MPG
(8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 85 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
45 MPG
(9.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Fiat Punto MPG is between 20 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.9 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.9 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Fiat Punto MPG is between 24 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Fiat Punto MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Fiat Punto MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 1.4 Turbo |
24
/
28 MPG
(9.7 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 D |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 |
29
/
43 MPG
(8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
70 1.7 TD |
28
/
48 MPG
(8.4 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
60 1.2 |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
75 1.2 |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.5 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
90 1.6 |
25
/
29 MPG
(9.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 1.4 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
28 MPG
(9.7 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
43 MPG
(8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 70 1.7 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
48 MPG
(8.4 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 60 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 75 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.5 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 90 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
29 MPG
(9.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |