Panda Fiat Panda MPG is between 32 MPG and 71 MPG depending on engine:
The Panda Fiat Panda MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Panda Fiat Panda MPG is up to 100% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
32
/
45 MPG
(7.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 Multijet II |
55
/
71 MPG
(4.3 / 3.3 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 100% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 |
50
/
67 MPG
(4.7 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 84% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
45 MPG
(7.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet II |
Consumption (city / highway) |
55
/
71 MPG
(4.3 / 3.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 100% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
50
/
67 MPG
(4.7 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 84% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Fiat Panda MPG is between 39 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Fiat Panda MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Fiat Panda MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 TwinAir |
39
/
41 MPG
(6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—373 miles
(600—600 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 Multijet II |
49
/
53 MPG
(4.8 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 TwinAir |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
41 MPG
(6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—373 miles (600—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 Multijet II |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
53 MPG
(4.8 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Fiat Panda MPG is between 32 MPG and 67 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Fiat Panda MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Fiat Panda MPG is up to 88% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
0.9 TwinAir |
35
/
49 MPG
(6.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
0.9 MultiAir |
35
/
49 MPG
(6.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 FIRE |
35
/
55 MPG
(6.7 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 EASY POWER |
33
/
37 MPG
(7.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 16V MULTIJET |
50
/
67 MPG
(4.7 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 88% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
0.9 TWIN AIR TURBO |
47
/
62 MPG
(5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 TwinAir |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
49 MPG
(6.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 MultiAir |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
49 MPG
(6.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 FIRE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
55 MPG
(6.7 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 EASY POWER |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
37 MPG
(7.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 16V MULTIJET |
Consumption (city / highway) |
50
/
67 MPG
(4.7 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 88% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 TWIN AIR TURBO |
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
62 MPG
(5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Fiat Panda MPG is between 39 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Fiat Panda MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Fiat Panda MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 TwinAIr |
39
/
41 MPG
(6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—373 miles
(600—600 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 MULTIJET 16V |
47
/
51 MPG
(5 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 TwinAIr |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
41 MPG
(6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—373 miles (600—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 MULTIJET 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
51 MPG
(5 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Fiat Panda MPG is 41 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2004 Fiat Panda MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 MPI 4x4 |
30
/
41 MPG
(7.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 13% better |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 MPI 4x4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
41 MPG
(7.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Fiat Panda MPG is between 33 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Fiat Panda MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Fiat Panda MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i 16V Multijet |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.4 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 MPI |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 MPI |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 8V |
37
/
59 MPG
(6.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V Multijet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.4 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 MPI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 MPI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.1 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 8V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
59 MPG
(6.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Panda Fiat Panda MPG is between 26 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The Panda Fiat Panda MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Panda Fiat Panda MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1000 Fire L |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1100 |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1100 Selecta CLX |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1100 Trecking 4x4 CL |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1100 Selecta CL |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
900 i |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
950 4x4 |
43
/
47 MPG
(5.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% better |
-
|
- |
Vehicle | 1000 Fire L |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1100 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1100 Selecta CLX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1100 Trecking 4x4 CL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1100 Selecta CL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 900 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 950 4x4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
47 MPG
(5.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | - |