2004 Fiat Multipla MPG is between 21 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Fiat Multipla MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Fiat Multipla MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 MultiJet |
29
/
42 MPG
(8.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 MultiJet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
42 MPG
(8.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Fiat Multipla MPG is between 21 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Fiat Multipla MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Fiat Multipla MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V Bipower |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V Blupower |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD 110 |
29
/
43 MPG
(8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V Bipower |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V Blupower |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD 110 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
43 MPG
(8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |