2006 Fiat Croma MPG is between 20 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Fiat Croma MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Fiat Croma MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 16V Multijet |
29
/
48 MPG
(8.2 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.5 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
24
/
39 MPG
(9.8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Multijet |
30
/
47 MPG
(7.9 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 Multijet |
20
/
39 MPG
(11.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V Multijet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
48 MPG
(8.2 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.5 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
39 MPG
(9.8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
47 MPG
(7.9 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
39 MPG
(11.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1986 Fiat Croma MPG is between 20 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 1986 Fiat Croma MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1986 Fiat Croma MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 CHT |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2000 i.e. |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1900 Turbo D i.d. |
39
/
60 MPG
(6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
746—1118 miles
(1200—1800 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2000 16V |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2500 TD |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2500 V6 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2000 CHT |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2000 i.e. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1900 Turbo D i.d. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
60 MPG
(6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1118 miles (1200—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2000 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2500 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2500 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |