2007 Fiat Bravo MPG is between 27 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Fiat Bravo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Fiat Bravo MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 MultiAir |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 T-Jet |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 MultiJet |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.6 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Multijet |
42
/
64 MPG
(5.6 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Multijet |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 MultiAir |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.3 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 T-Jet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 MultiJet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
52 MPG
(7.6 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
64 MPG
(5.6 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Multijet |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Fiat Bravo MPG is between 21 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Fiat Bravo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Fiat Bravo MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 16V 80 |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 GT |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD 105 |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TD 100 S |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TD 75 S |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HGT 20V |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD 100 |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V 80 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 GT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD 105 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD 100 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD 75 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HGT 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD 100 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |