2005 Daihatsu Sirion MPG is between 27 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Daihatsu Sirion MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Daihatsu Sirion MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i 16V |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 4WD |
29
/
44 MPG
(8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Daihatsu Sirion MPG is between 26 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Daihatsu Sirion MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Daihatsu Sirion MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 i 12V |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 i 12V 4WD |
28
/
38 MPG
(8.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
27
/
47 MPG
(8.6 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V 4WD |
26
/
42 MPG
(9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 i 12V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 i 12V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
38 MPG
(8.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
47 MPG
(8.6 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |