Daewoo Rezzo MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Daewoo Rezzo MPG by Years

- average 2000 Daewoo Rezzo MPG: 26 MPG / 9.6 L per 100 km
- worst 2000 Daewoo Rezzo MPG: 18 MPG / 12.9 L per 100 km
- best 2000 Daewoo Rezzo MPG: 35 MPG / 6.7 L per 100 km
- body weight: 1245 kg / 2745 lbs
- body type: minivan
- difference highway / city: 38%
- average engine power: 86 kW / 117 hp
- difference from world average: 19% worse
- max distance with full tank: 449 miles (723 km)
- Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2000 Daewoo Rezzo MPG is between 18 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:

2.0 i 16V — 18 to 30 MPG

2.0 i — 20 to 33 MPG

2.0 16V — 20 to 29 MPG

1.8 i — 19 to 33 MPG

1.6 i 16V — 21 to 35 MPG

The 2000 Daewoo Rezzo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

2.0 i 16V — 58 kg/mpg

2.0 i — 54 kg/mpg

2.0 16V — 53 kg/mpg

1.8 i — 49 kg/mpg

1.6 i 16V — 44 kg/mpg

We calculated that 2000 Daewoo Rezzo MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.

2.0 i 16V is 25% less economical than average car

2.0 i is 19% less economical than average car

2.0 16V is 25% less economical than average car

1.8 i is 22% less economical than average car

1.6 i 16V is 13% less economical than average car

Vehicle	Consumption (city / highway)	Consumption to weight ratio	Difference from world average consumption	Driving range (full tank)	Consumption per passenger
2.0 i 16V	18 / 30 MPG (12.9 / 7.9 L per 100 km)	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg	25% worse	311—497 miles (500—800 km)	1.9 L per 100 km / person
2.0 i	20 / 33 MPG (12 / 7.2 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	19% worse	311—497 miles (500—800 km)	1.8 L per 100 km / person
2.0 16V	20 / 29 MPG (12 / 8 L per 100 km)	1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg	25% worse	311—497 miles (500—800 km)	2 L per 100 km / person
1.8 i	19 / 33 MPG (12.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km)	1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg	22% worse	311—497 miles (500—800 km)	1.9 L per 100 km / person
1.6 i 16V	21 / 35 MPG (11 / 6.7 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	13% worse	311—559 miles (500—900 km)	1.2 L per 100 km / person

Vehicle	2.0 i 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	18 / 30 MPG (12.9 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	25% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—497 miles (500—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.9 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	2.0 i
Consumption (city / highway)	20 / 33 MPG (12 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	19% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—497 miles (500—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.8 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	2.0 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	20 / 29 MPG (12 / 8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	25% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—497 miles (500—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	2 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	1.8 i
Consumption (city / highway)	19 / 33 MPG (12.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	22% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—497 miles (500—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.9 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	1.6 i 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	21 / 35 MPG (11 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	13% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—559 miles (500—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.2 L per 100 km / person