2003 Daewoo Nubira MPG is between 24 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Daewoo Nubira MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Daewoo Nubira MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Daewoo Nubira MPG is between 19 MPG and 38 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Daewoo Nubira MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Daewoo Nubira MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V CDX |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V CDX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Daewoo Nubira MPG is between 19 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Daewoo Nubira MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Daewoo Nubira MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V CDX |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V CDX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG is between 17 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
16
/
32 MPG
(15.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
32 MPG
(15.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG is between 15 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Daewoo Nubira MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
15
/
31 MPG
(15.5 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
31 MPG
(15.5 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |