1999 Daewoo Musso MPG is between 14 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Daewoo Musso MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Daewoo Musso MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 24V |
14
/
21 MPG
(16.9 / 11 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
14
/
24 MPG
(16.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 D |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 D |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V |
14
/
24 MPG
(16.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 TD |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
21 MPG
(16.9 / 11 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(16.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(16.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |