1999 Daewoo Korando MPG is between 14 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Daewoo Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Daewoo Korando MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 TD |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.8 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 D |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 TD |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 |
14
/
19 MPG
(17.3 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.8 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(17.3 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |