cat_logo
HomeCitroen

Xm

Citroen XM MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Citroen XM MPG by Years

Citroen XM MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Citroen XM MPG

    • average 1995 Citroen XM MPG: 27 MPG / 9.6 L per 100 km
    • worst 1995 Citroen XM MPG: 13 MPG / 18 L per 100 km
    • best 1995 Citroen XM MPG: 42 MPG / 5.6 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1655 kg / 3649 lbs
    • body type: station wagon (estate)
    • difference highway / city: 40%
    • average engine power: 104 kW / 141 hp
    • difference from world average: 16% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 672 miles (1081 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1995 Citroen XM MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1995 Citroen XM MPG is between 13 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 TD 12V — 25 to 42 MPG
  • 2.0 Turbo — 16 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V — 29 to 36 MPG
  • 2.5 TD — 22 to 40 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 13 to 28 MPG


    1995 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.1 TD 12V — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Turbo — 73 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TD — 59 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 92 kg/mpg


    1995 Citroen XM MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Citroen XM MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 TD 12V is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Turbo is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V is 0% more economical than average car
  • 2.5 TD is 13% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Citroen XM Break (Y4) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 TD 12V 25 / 42 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Turbo 16 / 29 MPG
    (14.5 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 29 / 36 MPG
    (8.2 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 621—746 miles
    (1000—1200 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TD 22 / 40 MPG
    (10.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—870 miles
    (700—1400 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 13 / 28 MPG
    (18 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—621 miles
    (400—1000 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Citroen XM Break (Y4) MPG

    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 42 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 29 MPG
    (14.5 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 36 MPG
    (8.2 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 40 MPG
    (10.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—870 miles (700—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 28 MPG
    (18 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—621 miles (400—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Citroen XM MPG

      • average 1995 Citroen XM MPG: 25 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 1995 Citroen XM MPG: 15 MPG / 15.9 L per 100 km
      • best 1995 Citroen XM MPG: 42 MPG / 5.6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1500 kg / 3308 lbs
      • body type: hatchback
      • difference highway / city: 42%
      • average engine power: 111 kW / 151 hp
      • difference from world average: 22% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 654 miles (1053 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1995 Citroen XM MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1995 Citroen XM MPG is between 15 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 15 to 29 MPG
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 25 to 42 MPG
  • 2.0 Turbo — 16 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.5 TD — 22 to 40 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 24V — 18 to 26 MPG


    1995 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 78 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Turbo — 67 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TD — 56 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 24V — 71 kg/mpg


    1995 Citroen XM MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Citroen XM MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 TD 12V is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Turbo is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 TD is 13% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 24V is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Citroen XM (Y4) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.9 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 TD 12V 25 / 42 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Turbo 16 / 29 MPG
    (14.5 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TD 22 / 40 MPG
    (10.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—870 miles
    (700—1400 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 24V 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Citroen XM (Y4) MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.9 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 42 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 29 MPG
    (14.5 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 40 MPG
    (10.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—870 miles (700—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Citroen XM MPG

      • average 1990 Citroen XM MPG: 27 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1990 Citroen XM MPG: 15 MPG / 15.9 L per 100 km
      • best 1990 Citroen XM MPG: 47 MPG / 5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1420 kg / 3131 lbs
      • body type: hatchback
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 102 kW / 138 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 753 miles (1212 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1990 Citroen XM MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1990 Citroen XM MPG is between 15 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 i TCT — 19 to 33 MPG
  • 2.0 i — 18 to 35 MPG
  • 2.1 D 12V — 31 to 46 MPG
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 30 to 47 MPG
  • 3.0 i V6 24V — 15 to 29 MPG
  • 3.0 i V6 — 16 to 30 MPG


    1990 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio

    The 1990 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 i TCT — 54 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 D 12V — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 38 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 i V6 24V — 64 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 i V6 — 57 kg/mpg


    1990 Citroen XM MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1990 Citroen XM MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 i TCT is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 D 12V is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.1 TD 12V is 13% more economical than average car
  • 3.0 i V6 24V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 i V6 is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1990 Citroen XM (Y3) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 i TCT 19 / 33 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—746 miles
    (600—1200 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 D 12V 31 / 46 MPG
    (7.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 684—994 miles
    (1100—1600 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 TD 12V 30 / 47 MPG
    (7.9 / 5 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 621—994 miles
    (1000—1600 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 i V6 24V 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.9 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 i V6 16 / 30 MPG
    (15 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1990 Citroen XM (Y3) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 i TCT
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 33 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—746 miles (600—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 D 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 46 MPG
    (7.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—994 miles (1100—1600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 47 MPG
    (7.9 / 5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—994 miles (1000—1600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.9 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 30 MPG
    (15 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Citroen XM MPG

      • average 1990 Citroen XM MPG: 28 MPG / 8.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1990 Citroen XM MPG: 16 MPG / 15 L per 100 km
      • best 1990 Citroen XM MPG: 47 MPG / 5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1505 kg / 3319 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 40%
      • average engine power: 92 kW / 125 hp
      • difference from world average: 13% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 753 miles (1212 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1990 Citroen XM MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1990 Citroen XM MPG is between 16 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 i — 18 to 34 MPG
  • 2.1 D 12V — 31 to 45 MPG
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT — 19 to 32 MPG
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 30 to 47 MPG
  • 3.0 i V6 — 16 to 29 MPG


    1990 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio

    The 1990 Citroen XM MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 i — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 D 12V — 41 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 40 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 i V6 — 63 kg/mpg


    1990 Citroen XM MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1990 Citroen XM MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 i is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 D 12V is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 TD 12V is 13% more economical than average car
  • 3.0 i V6 is 25% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1990 Citroen XM Break (Y3) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 i 18 / 34 MPG
    (12.8 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 D 12V 31 / 45 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 621—932 miles
    (1000—1500 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i Turbo CT 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 TD 12V 30 / 47 MPG
    (7.9 / 5 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 621—994 miles
    (1000—1600 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 i V6 16 / 29 MPG
    (15 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1990 Citroen XM Break (Y3) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 34 MPG
    (12.8 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 D 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 45 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i Turbo CT
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 47 MPG
    (7.9 / 5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—994 miles (1000—1600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 29 MPG
    (15 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings