1998 Citroen Xantia MPG is between 15 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Citroen Xantia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Citroen Xantia MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Turbo D |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.9 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
20
/
37 MPG
(12 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.8 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDI 109 |
34
/
52 MPG
(6.9 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 Turbo D 12V |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDI |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.9 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(12 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.8 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 109 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
52 MPG
(6.9 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo D 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Citroen Xantia MPG is between 15 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Citroen Xantia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Citroen Xantia MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
18
/
33 MPG
(13.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
15
/
29 MPG
(16.1 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 SD |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.2 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Turbo D |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.4 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(13.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(16.1 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 SD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.2 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.4 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Citroen Xantia MPG is between 19 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Citroen Xantia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Citroen Xantia MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Turbo D |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
26
/
38 MPG
(9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Citroen Xantia MPG is between 22 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Citroen Xantia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Citroen Xantia MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 Turbo D |
34
/
48 MPG
(6.9 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 Turbo D 12V |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
48 MPG
(6.9 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo D 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |