1996 Citroen Saxo MPG is between 21 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Citroen Saxo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Citroen Saxo MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 SX |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 X |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 X,SX |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 D |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 VTL,VTR |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i VTS |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 VTS |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 SX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 X |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 X,SX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 VTL,VTR |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i VTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 VTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |