2008 Chrysler Voyager MPG is between 21 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Chrysler Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Chrysler Voyager MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 CRD |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4i R4 16V |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i R4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Chrysler Voyager MPG is between 14 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Chrysler Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Chrysler Voyager MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 CRD TD |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 CRD TD |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i V6 |
14
/
24 MPG
(17.3 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 AWD |
17
/
22 MPG
(13.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 CRD TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRD TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(17.3 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
22 MPG
(13.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Chrysler Voyager MPG is between 13 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Chrysler Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Chrysler Voyager MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.2 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.4 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD |
21
/
35 MPG
(11 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i AWD |
13
/
22 MPG
(18.5 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.2 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.4 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
35 MPG
(11 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
22 MPG
(18.5 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Voyager Chrysler Voyager MPG is between 15 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The Voyager Chrysler Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Voyager Chrysler Voyager MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i |
17
/
33 MPG
(14.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—684 miles
(500—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.7 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.5 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
15
/
23 MPG
(15.2 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 AWD |
15
/
23 MPG
(15.4 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(14.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—684 miles (500—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.7 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.5 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
23 MPG
(15.2 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
23 MPG
(15.4 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |