2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is between 13 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 CRD |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.8i V6 |
13
/
27 MPG
(18.3 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(18.3 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is between 13 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 CRD |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i V6 AWD |
14
/
24 MPG
(17.3 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 CRD TD |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i V6 |
14
/
19 MPG
(17.3 / 12.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 CRD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(17.3 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRD TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(17.3 / 12.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is between 12 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 V6 |
12
/
21 MPG
(19 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
33 MPG
(11.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
21 MPG
(19 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Chrysler Grand Voyager MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.7 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 AWD |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.7 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |