2005 Chrysler 300 MPG is between 12 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Chrysler 300 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Chrysler 300 MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 24V CRD |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 i V8 16V |
12
/
24 MPG
(19.5 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 i V8 AWD |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.9 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V CRD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
24 MPG
(19.5 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.9 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Chrysler 300 MPG is between 11 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Chrysler 300 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Chrysler 300 MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V |
14
/
28 MPG
(16.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 i V6 24V |
15
/
28 MPG
(16.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 24V CRD |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.2 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 i V8 16V |
13
/
26 MPG
(18.3 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 i V8 AWD |
12
/
24 MPG
(19 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
11
/
24 MPG
(21 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
186—435 miles
(300—700 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
28 MPG
(16.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(16.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V CRD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.2 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
26 MPG
(18.3 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
24 MPG
(19 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
24 MPG
(21 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—435 miles (300—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
300 Chrysler 300 MPG is between 11 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 300 Chrysler 300 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 300 Chrysler 300 MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRT 6.4 |
11
/
27 MPG
(20.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
186—497 miles
(300—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.6 |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 |
16
/
25 MPG
(14.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | SRT 6.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
27 MPG
(20.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—497 miles (300—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
25 MPG
(14.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
300 Chrysler 300 MPG is between 14 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 300 Chrysler 300 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 300 Chrysler 300 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.3 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 |
16
/
25 MPG
(14.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
SRT8 6.4 HEMI V8 |
14
/
23 MPG
(16.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.3 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
25 MPG
(14.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | SRT8 6.4 HEMI V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
23 MPG
(16.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |