2015 Chrysler 200 MPG is between 18 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Chrysler 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Chrysler 200 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Chrysler 200 MPG is between 19 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Chrysler 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Chrysler 200 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Chrysler 200 MPG is between 18 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Chrysler 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Chrysler 200 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |