cat_logo
HomeChevrolet

Tracker

Chevrolet Tracker MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Chevrolet Tracker MPG by Years

Chevrolet Tracker MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Chevrolet Tracker MPG

    • average 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: 21 MPG / 11.3 L per 100 km
    • worst 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: 17 MPG / 14 L per 100 km
    • best 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1390 kg / 3065 lbs
    • body type: off-road vehicle
    • difference highway / city: 24%
    • average engine power: 103 kW / 140 hp
    • difference from world average: 34% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 418 miles (673 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5 i V6 4WD — 18 to 20 MPG
  • 2.5 i V6 — 19 to 21 MPG
  • 1.6 i 16V — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 2.5 i V6 24V — 19 to 21 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V 4 WD — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V 4WD — 23 to 25 MPG


    1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5 i V6 4WD — 73 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 i V6 — 67 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 i 16V — 65 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V — 65 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 i V6 24V — 67 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V 4 WD — 65 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V 4WD — 58 kg/mpg


    1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5 i V6 4WD is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 i V6 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 i 16V is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 i V6 24V is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V 4 WD is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V 4WD is 25% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Chevrolet Tracker II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5 i V6 4WD 18 / 20 MPG
    (13.1 / 11.8 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 i V6 19 / 21 MPG
    (12.4 / 11.2 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 i 16V 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 i V6 24V 19 / 21 MPG
    (12.4 / 11.2 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 4 WD 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 4WD 23 / 25 MPG
    (10.2 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 373—435 miles
    (600—700 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Chevrolet Tracker II MPG

    Vehicle 2.5 i V6 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 20 MPG
    (13.1 / 11.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 21 MPG
    (12.4 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 i V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 21 MPG
    (12.4 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V 4 WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 25 MPG
    (10.2 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—435 miles (600—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Chevrolet Tracker MPG

      • average 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: 22 MPG / 10.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: 17 MPG / 14 L per 100 km
      • best 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1235 kg / 2723 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 33%
      • average engine power: 83 kW / 113 hp
      • difference from world average: 31% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 362 miles (583 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 i 16V 4WD — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 1.6 i 16V — 20 to 27 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V — 18 to 25 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V 4WD — 21 to 29 MPG


    1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 i 16V 4WD — 59 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 i 16V — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V 4WD — 49 kg/mpg


    1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Chevrolet Tracker MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 i 16V 4WD is 34% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 i 16V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V 4WD is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Chevrolet Tracker Convertibe II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 i 16V 4WD 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 i 16V 20 / 27 MPG
    (12 / 8.7 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—311 miles
    (400—500 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 18 / 25 MPG
    (13 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V 4WD 21 / 29 MPG
    (11 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Chevrolet Tracker Convertibe II MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 27 MPG
    (12 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—311 miles (400—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 25 MPG
    (13 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 29 MPG
    (11 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings