2014 Cadillac CTS MPG is between 19 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 Cadillac CTS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Cadillac CTS MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.6 V6 |
19
/
32 MPG
(12.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
32 MPG
(12.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Cadillac CTS MPG is between 12 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Cadillac CTS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Cadillac CTS MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
V 6.2 V8 |
12
/
18 MPG
(19.6 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
8.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.6 V6 |
15
/
30 MPG
(16 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
18 MPG
(19.6 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 8.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
30 MPG
(16 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Cadillac CTS MPG is between 14 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Cadillac CTS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Cadillac CTS MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
V 6.2 V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.6 V6 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Cadillac CTS MPG is between 14 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Cadillac CTS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Cadillac CTS MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6L V6 SIDI |
14
/
29 MPG
(16.8 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
V 6.2 V8 |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6L V6 SIDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
29 MPG
(16.8 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
19 MPG
(16.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Cadillac CTS MPG is between 13 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Cadillac CTS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Cadillac CTS MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2i V6 24V |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.9 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.6i V6 24V L |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.8i V6 24V |
14
/
26 MPG
(17 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.6i V6 24V |
15
/
28 MPG
(16.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
V 5.7 i V8 |
13
/
26 MPG
(18 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
V 6.0 i V8 |
16
/
25 MPG
(14.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.9 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.6i V6 24V L |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(17 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(16.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | V 5.7 i V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
26 MPG
(18 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | V 6.0 i V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
25 MPG
(14.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |