Cadillac ATS MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Cadillac ATS MPG by Years

Cadillac ATS MPG - Choose Generation

Quick Notes on Cadillac ATS MPG

    • average 2015 Cadillac ATS MPG: 23 MPG / 10.8 L per 100 km
    • worst 2015 Cadillac ATS MPG: 16 MPG / 14.7 L per 100 km
    • best 2015 Cadillac ATS MPG: 31 MPG / 7.6 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1550 kg / 3418 lbs
    • body type: coupe
    • difference highway / city: 33%
    • average engine power: 263 kW / 357 hp
    • difference from world average: 28% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 396 miles (638 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2015 Cadillac ATS MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2015 Cadillac ATS MPG is between 16 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 — 21 to 31 MPG
  • V 3.6 V6 — 16 to 24 MPG
  • 3.6 V6 — 18 to 28 MPG

    2015 Cadillac ATS MPG to weight ratio

    The 2015 Cadillac ATS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • V 3.6 V6 — 91 kg/mpg
  • 3.6 V6 — 70 kg/mpg

    2015 Cadillac ATS MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2015 Cadillac ATS MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 is 22% less economical than average car
  • V 3.6 V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 2015 Cadillac ATS Coupe MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    - 22% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km / person
    V 3.6 V6 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    3.1 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 V6 18 / 28 MPG
    (13.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2015 Cadillac ATS Coupe MPG

    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle V 3.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 28 MPG
    (13.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Cadillac ATS MPG

      • average 2013 Cadillac ATS MPG: 24 MPG / 10.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 2013 Cadillac ATS MPG: 17 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2013 Cadillac ATS MPG: 37 MPG / 6.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1729 kg / 3812 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 238 kW / 323 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 459 miles (738 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2013 Cadillac ATS MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2013 Cadillac ATS MPG is between 17 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 — 20 to 37 MPG
  • 2.5 — 22 to 33 MPG
  • 3.6 V6 — 19 to 28 MPG
  • V 3.6 V6 — 17 to 23 MPG

    2013 Cadillac ATS MPG to weight ratio

    The 2013 Cadillac ATS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 — 58 kg/mpg
  • 3.6 V6 — 75 kg/mpg
  • V 3.6 V6 — 91 kg/mpg

    2013 Cadillac ATS MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2013 Cadillac ATS MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 is 13% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • V 3.6 V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 2013 Cadillac ATS Sedan MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 20 / 37 MPG
    (12 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 22 / 33 MPG
    (10.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 V6 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    V 3.6 V6 17 / 23 MPG
    (13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2013 Cadillac ATS Sedan MPG

    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 37 MPG
    (12 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 33 MPG
    (10.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle V 3.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 23 MPG
    (13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person