1992 Buick Skylark MPG is between 19 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Buick Skylark MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Buick Skylark MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 i 16V |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.1 i V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.1 i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Buick Skylark MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The 1992 Buick Skylark MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Buick Skylark MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 i V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.1 i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |